cyclonenation10
Well-known member
Any quail hen shot doesn’t nest at all. Yet quail have not been eliminated.
Considering ALL of the other winged game, waterfowl and upland, hens are fair game. With a lot of duck species it’s very easy to differentiate hens from drakes; hens are still fair game.
The “fact” that pheasant hens nest only once appears to be incorrect according to Pheasants Forever:
Facts Surrounding the Magic of Nesting Season
Springtime throughout pheasant country brings with it one of the great disappearing acts of the world and the most critical period of the year for ringnecks – nesting season for hen pheasants.pheasantsforever.org
“Although subsequent nesting attempts attributed to nest predation or abandonment produce fewer eggs, pheasants are very capable of hatching chicks into the waning months of summer. Additionally, chicks hatched late in the season have a lower chance at survival, so more successful early nesting attempts means more birds recruited into the fall population.”
Which sounds a lot like quail.
Colinus virginianus (northern bobwhite)
animaldiversity.org
Animal Diversity Web (ADW) is an online database of animal natural history, distribution, classification, and conservation biology at the University of Michigan
“Bobwhites mate in their first year of life and rear one brood a year. Nests destroyed before hatching will be rebuilt while broods lost after hatching are usually not replaced.”
Again, I doubt adding an optional hen to a bag limit would make much difference in overall population. For example 3 cocks or 2 cocks and 1 hen.
The lack of habitat exacerbated by the run of poor weather during the nesting/rearing period is the true problem. IMO.
"Any quail hen shot doesn't nest at all. Yet quail have not been eliminated"
I understand your point here. One thing I'd be curious on (no way to get data on) is how many MORE quail there would be if hens couldn't be shot? I'm not sure, given that they are monogamous vs. polygamous (pheasants).
It is my personal opinion that pheasants would not be eliminated but that we would see the populations fall by 70-80% if you could shoot hens. Based on that alone, there would be more roosters to shoot each year than there would be pheasants TOTAL if hunting hens was allowed.
IF my opinion is true (very well could be wrong), then I would much rather never shoot a hen, and have a substantially higher population to hunt than have a smaller population that I could shoot either sex. If that makes sense?
I agree though that it definitely comes down to habitat. Weather is always variable, but that is cyclical. Bird numbers will ebb and flow over the short term with weather. Regardless of the weather, there will always be birds around to repopulate if there is adequate habitat. There is a reason long-term pheasant population trends follow so closely with CRP enrollment.