I guess to some on here those of us that pay are somehow less noble sportsmen.
I can say there is a form of satisfaction, or, maybe a feeling of tradition, a reflection of what was "hunting in America" when hunting ditches, public land, or getting permission to hunt private land with a simple "yes".
The flip side of this of course, is when you pay to hunt, your undoubtedly going to have hot action. This amongst other benefits too. This is what many come to SD for. To be honest, I wouldn't mind a hunt or two with a quick limit like that either!
I made an argument in favor of pay to hunt operations last fall. Had my ass handed to me.
The point I was trying to make then was one has to consider the vast amounts of habitat put into the ground as a result of pay-to-hunt hunters, and of course the income proved to the landowners of such land. Pay-to-hunt is one of the few things that can compete with grain prices at this time.
There's a lot of habitat in SD due to pay-to-hunt operations. It produces birds, as does public lands. Birds roam from area to area, ditch to ditch. Each of us gets our chance at them at some point.
IF we can manage to maintain millions of acres of public land, and increase those acres over time, along side with pay-to-hunt operations, we have a recipe for birds and other wildlife.
Of course we have to be VERY careful we don't fall into the same trap our European friends fell into through pay-to-hunt hunting operations. It's no good. And, right now, we are walking a fine line between the two. Our "free access" saving grace is public land.