Orange

Someone help me here. Whether or not orange is required we all have to agree it is an aide in safety. I guess I fail to understand the logic in not wanting to wear orange. Look at it from one of your hunting buddies perspective. How would he feel if he shot you because he did not see you since you were not wearing any orange? Would the orange have saved you, not necessarily, but it would have made it a lot easier for your buddy to see you.

I have orange caps, vests, jackets, etc. Hell, I might even buy some orange briefs!! When I'm in the field I want to be seen. I do not want to get shot. You all can do as you please, I'm not going to force my opinion on anyone. Heck we even have to wear orange in our NSTRA field trials. SAFETY FIRST!

+1, my hunting partner is used to wear no orange, it drove me nuts in heavy cover as I couldn't keep track of him and had to pass up lots of birds because I didn't know where he was. I see no downside to wearing orange, just my two cents.
 
+1, my hunting partner is used to wear no orange, it drove me nuts in heavy cover as I couldn't keep track of him and had to pass up lots of birds because I didn't know where he was. I see no downside to wearing orange, just my two cents.
I would refuse to hunt with anyone that will not wear orange. It is not worth ruining a hunt because of passed up shots, or the risk of injury!
 
I hate it when I bag my partner, I have tell his wife, and he never fits in my gamebag, dragging him back, makes an open casket iffy! It's good to have friends who know the score, or at least have good discussion on the procedures afield, with safety first. I can be a little delicate to deliberate up front but I find it is recieved by relief, everybody chimes in. We are in agreement and safe. Nobody wants a great day ruined by some stupid accident. I do believe most hunters are now safer then they were 30 years ago, I give the credit to hunter safety, and their volunteers.
 
david0311

I hate it when I bag my partner, I have tell his wife, and he never fits in my gamebag, dragging him back, makes an open casket iffy! It's good to have friends who know the score, or at least have good discussion on the procedures afield, with safety first. I can be a little delicate to deliberate up front but I find it is recieved by relief, everybody chimes in. We are in agreement and safe. Nobody wants a great day ruined by some stupid accident. I do believe most hunters are now safer then they were 30 years ago, I give the credit to hunter safety, and their volunteers.

LOL--that is the best response to this post I have seen--would only add the difficulty of a really big guy, that you have to quarter to get them out--:rolleyes:
 
Why can a person pick berries, hike, cut wood, shoot photo's, Etc all during hunting season but no requirement of blaze orange?

There's a much bigger picture here but few see it or are willing to acknowledge it.

UMMM because this is America?If you shoot a bowhunter who's up a tree,you are an idiot beyond description.If you can't tell a berry picker from a rooster bird,well.
 
Another thing to concider is that deer hunting gun season may be open when you are hunting. And you might not know where all the deer hunters are or they might not know that you will be in the same area as them. I recommend wearing it.
 
I know quite a few people that were orange during deer season when they are just out in there yard. If your out in the woods or fields during deer season orange is a must. If people are out in the woods and are dumb enough to not were it thats there life they are taking into there own hands. Some people are just dumb.
 
I know quite a few people that were orange during deer season when they are just out in there yard. If your out in the woods or fields during deer season orange is a must. If people are out in the woods and are dumb enough to not were it thats there life they are taking into there own hands. Some people are just dumb.

Thank You, we have the right,as Americans, to be stupid.I find this preferable to having a law for every situation and eventuality.
 
I know quite a few people that were orange during deer season when they are just out in there yard. If your out in the woods or fields during deer season orange is a must. If people are out in the woods and are dumb enough to not were it thats there life they are taking into there own hands. Some people are just dumb.
Guess you could call it filtering the tirds from the gene pool :D
 
We have the right as Americans to have choices.

Yes we have that right but think of the bad press if a hunter shoots another hunter. Or if a hunter shoots a berry picker:eek: because they were behind there shot and they did not see them. Were orange and when you see people out in the woods tell them to were orange. Well I dont think it needs to be a law it is the smart thing to do.
 
My questions is - Why not wear orange? Are you people that don't wear orange.... "hiding from the pheasants". :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Respond away!!!!!
 
When big game season is on in the Black Hills,I have personally watched other hunters keep track of their buddies and others by watching them through a rifle scope.I have seen this numerous times.Just one more dumb move and you get a .270 in the back.They wouldn't even be able to see them except for them glowing like a beacon.they say a deer can't see color,but they can definately see the UV brighteners in it that make you glow to them.that said, I still wear it.

I think the danger factor for upland hunting is highly over-stated.Every time I have been showered by pellets it was due to simply being out of sight because of topography.I know a lot of you come from areas where hunter density (and stupidity) abound. I maintain that it's not a huge deal out here.Shotguns are really only lethal for about 50 yards,every time I have been showered has been at distance much greater than that.You can hear the pellets coming and take cover,that's when being properly protected is far more important than the color of the clothing.I prefer to see earth tones in the field,hunter orange doesn't do a lot to add to a natural environment.If you are going to blast your buddy point blank,that's going to happen simply because of idiocy and not color of clothing.
 
Dear Ranchodeluxe:
This is off subject, but I have to say the more I read your posts I wish I had taken the time to meet you when you lived near Cascade Wi. As I was raised there and hunt that area 3 or 4 times a week. But I am one of those hunters that is afraid to go hunting with someone I do not know. Did you ever sell your house? lab man
 
Nope,leased it and going to let it ride until things either get better with the economy or we all go down together.Are you coming to SD?Would have been nice to have a hunting pard there,didn't know many folks.
 
About ten years ago in my home state a guy was killed with buckshot by a hunter in a tree stand who shot through some brush. There was a big discussion, including by officials with the State Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, about whether the victim should have been in orange. I presume he, too, was a hunter, but I can't really remember.

As a hunter, I couldn't believe the focus of that tragedy was on the victim, even for a minute. As hunters, it's our duty never even to point our firearms in the direction of something we haven't positively identified as legal game, situated in a place free from any danger to other human beings, if we were to pull the trigger. That victim could have been a Boy Scout on an orienteering mission, or a birdwatcher or a mom looking for a dog. The failure was entirely on the hunter who shot something he hadn't positively identified. There should have been no discussion about the guy -- hunter or not -- who failed to put on orange. At the very least, we know that the shooter had never identified his target as a buck versus a doe, or a buck with shootable antlers. Knowing that much, I didn't much care whether the victim was wearing orange.

That said, I won't bird hunt with anyone who doesn't put on orange. It's sort of like the "one beer" thread. No, there's no excuse for anyone shooting in the direction of someone, whether they're wearing orange or not. But it's just too simple a solution, that adds something -- however small -- to the safety equation, not to do it. Sure, some idiot may shoot you anyway, but anyone but the colorblind would have to admit that a guy in orange is more noticeable than the guy who's not in orange. It's easier to keep track of everyone in the group. If you make the stupid mistake of swinging toward your hunting buddy, you're more likely to be saved from yourself if your buddy is in orange. So why not take the safer route?

I happen to like the fact that South Dakota doesn't require orange. I'm enough of a libertarian that I don't even like seatbelt laws much. But I wear them, and would whether or not there was a law. Just because the government hasn't become the nanny state on this issue, doesn't mean that we hunters shouldn't take the safest route and wear orange.

Heck, I wear them as much because of the other nimrod who sneaks into the field, or for the crazy deer hunter road hunting from 400 yards away, as I do for my own group.
 
About ten years ago in my home state a guy was killed with buckshot by a hunter in a tree stand who shot through some brush. There was a big discussion, including by officials with the State Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, about whether the victim should have been in orange. I presume he, too, was a hunter, but I can't really remember.

As a hunter, I couldn't believe the focus of that tragedy was on the victim, even for a minute. As hunters, it's our duty never even to point our firearms in the direction of something we haven't positively identified as legal game, situated in a place free from any danger to other human beings, if we were to pull the trigger. That victim could have been a Boy Scout on an orienteering mission, or a birdwatcher or a mom looking for a dog. The failure was entirely on the hunter who shot something he hadn't positively identified. There should have been no discussion about the guy -- hunter or not -- who failed to put on orange. At the very least, we know that the shooter had never identified his target as a buck versus a doe, or a buck with shootable antlers. Knowing that much, I didn't much care whether the victim was wearing orange.

That said, I won't bird hunt with anyone who doesn't put on orange. It's sort of like the "one beer" thread. No, there's no excuse for anyone shooting in the direction of someone, whether they're wearing orange or not. But it's just too simple a solution, that adds something -- however small -- to the safety equation, not to do it. Sure, some idiot may shoot you anyway, but anyone but the colorblind would have to admit that a guy in orange is more noticeable than the guy who's not in orange. It's easier to keep track of everyone in the group. If you make the stupid mistake of swinging toward your hunting buddy, you're more likely to be saved from yourself if your buddy is in orange. So why not take the safer route?

I happen to like the fact that South Dakota doesn't require orange. I'm enough of a libertarian that I don't even like seatbelt laws much. But I wear them, and would whether or not there was a law. Just because the government hasn't become the nanny state on this issue, doesn't mean that we hunters shouldn't take the safest route and wear orange.

Heck, I wear them as much because of the other nimrod who sneaks into the field, or for the crazy deer hunter road hunting from 400 yards away, as I do for my own group.

Nice post.
 
Yes, ranchodeluxe, 3 of us will be hunting in SD Nov 6-10. Over the past 8 years we have gotten to know a land owner, the first year he let us hunt on his land for 1 day, so that Christmas we sent him a gift basket of cheese and sausage, over the next 2 or 3 years I called him and ask if we could hunt on his land for 2 or 3 days. The last 2 years he has invited us to hunt on his land the 5 days that we are there. He has a girlfriend now so we have decided to give a larger gift certificate from the local restaurant plus a gift basket from here. As you know we have a lot of cheese and sausage companies in Sheboygan county Wi. But we never know until September if we can hunt here. He has relatives from Wi that get first chance and a high school friend from Mn that get second chance. The place that we stay at gives you first chance to reserve that same week for next year so we do not want to change the dates from the third week of hunting season. lab man
 
My questions is - Why not wear orange? Are you people that don't wear orange.... "hiding from the pheasants". :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Respond away!!!!!

Yes. Late season hunting there are times when blockers hide behind bales and take off their orange and do what ever they can to avoid detection by the rooster that flies straight up with his head swiveling to spot the area that doesn't have a hunter in it. Late season wild birds are a different type of hunt.
 
There is a reason why they call things "safety devices". I never was real keen on seat belts until I had a head on collision by someone coming completey over the line into my lane. 70 MPH of impact took my knuckles with the steering wheel into the dash; the seat belt brused my shoulder. With out it I would have a steering wheel and colum in my chest.:eek:
As for the poor person who gets shot while in a bush by some dumb @$$, you have to wonder if they would still be alive if they had orange on. There is no vindication for the shooter, it is for personal safety as much as anything. Nuf said
 
Back
Top