cyclonenation10
Well-known member
Just throwing this out there for some discussion, but how do you judge a good bird dog?
Personally, I've always hunted with Golden Retrievers (more recently the English Cream/Show breed). Many say they can't hunt, and I disagree. I'm convinced that nearly any dog will eventually hunt, regardless of any training, simply by getting the dog out frequently on birds. For example, my female has absolutely no hunting pedigree, runs like a show dog, and is the laziest (but also smartest) dog that I've ever owned. As a puppy, and to this day, she won't even flinch at the sight of a thrown tennis ball, pheasant dummy, cat, or anything. However, get her in the pheasant field and she has a motor that will not stop and is a joy to hunt with. She listens, stays close, and will hunt any cover in a very methodical way. She's had well over 250 wild birds shot over her and is 5 years old. Her main downfall - she rarely retrieves to hand except on certain occasions. Despite that, she never loses a bird and will find and catch a cripple as good as any dog I've seen - she just falls short on the actual retrieve part. I've hunted her with all sorts of different dogs with much better pedigrees (many of which have had thousands of dollars spent on formal training)and it never fails that by the end of the day it's usually a consensus agreement that she is as good or better than any other dog in the bunch, and also listens much better, providing a much more enjoyable experience. On the other hand I've got a male who is a very committed retriever, bringing birds to hand every time. He doesn't have quite the hunting motor, despite being much more high strung outside of the field. I thoroughly enjoy hunting with each dog, and wish I could combine the hunting/temperament of my female with the retrieving drive of my male (and have a near perfect hunting dog). While each is far from perfect, we kill tons of birds, many of which are on public ground each and every year. If it was a competition (it's not), and the goal was simply to kill birds, I would take either one of these two over just about every other dog I've ever hunted with. However, if you entered them in some sort of field trial, where every little thing is judged, I'm sure they'd get blown out of the water.
For me, I want to have a dog that's going to help me kill birds and that enjoys the hunting/companionship as much as I do. Also, I want a great house dog and companion for the other 9 months of the season that I can trust around anyone and leave alone in the house without a worry in the world. Whether they check each and every box (retreive to hand, etc.) doesn't really matter to me. We have fun, kill lots of birds, and I don't believe we leave much on the table. I think I could spend a lot of money on a dog bred purely for hunting such as a GSP, Brittany, etc. and I wouldn't kill any more birds that I do now (with the added downside of a dog that is way to springy/high strung for my liking in and out of the field). I've got the luxury of a flexible work schedule that allows me to get out hunting 40-50 x throughout the course of the season, so these dogs have the benefit of being on birds ALOT. I do next to nothing as far as field training, other than basic obedience and trust (I know they are never going to run off, chase a deer, etc.). Outside of that, it's all just getting them hunting. If I didn't get out near as much, I'm sure it may be worth getting more of a purebred hunting dog with more natural pedigree.
This leads me to my question.. how do you judge a good hunting dog? In my case, I very much have a "good enough" mindset
Personally, I've always hunted with Golden Retrievers (more recently the English Cream/Show breed). Many say they can't hunt, and I disagree. I'm convinced that nearly any dog will eventually hunt, regardless of any training, simply by getting the dog out frequently on birds. For example, my female has absolutely no hunting pedigree, runs like a show dog, and is the laziest (but also smartest) dog that I've ever owned. As a puppy, and to this day, she won't even flinch at the sight of a thrown tennis ball, pheasant dummy, cat, or anything. However, get her in the pheasant field and she has a motor that will not stop and is a joy to hunt with. She listens, stays close, and will hunt any cover in a very methodical way. She's had well over 250 wild birds shot over her and is 5 years old. Her main downfall - she rarely retrieves to hand except on certain occasions. Despite that, she never loses a bird and will find and catch a cripple as good as any dog I've seen - she just falls short on the actual retrieve part. I've hunted her with all sorts of different dogs with much better pedigrees (many of which have had thousands of dollars spent on formal training)and it never fails that by the end of the day it's usually a consensus agreement that she is as good or better than any other dog in the bunch, and also listens much better, providing a much more enjoyable experience. On the other hand I've got a male who is a very committed retriever, bringing birds to hand every time. He doesn't have quite the hunting motor, despite being much more high strung outside of the field. I thoroughly enjoy hunting with each dog, and wish I could combine the hunting/temperament of my female with the retrieving drive of my male (and have a near perfect hunting dog). While each is far from perfect, we kill tons of birds, many of which are on public ground each and every year. If it was a competition (it's not), and the goal was simply to kill birds, I would take either one of these two over just about every other dog I've ever hunted with. However, if you entered them in some sort of field trial, where every little thing is judged, I'm sure they'd get blown out of the water.
For me, I want to have a dog that's going to help me kill birds and that enjoys the hunting/companionship as much as I do. Also, I want a great house dog and companion for the other 9 months of the season that I can trust around anyone and leave alone in the house without a worry in the world. Whether they check each and every box (retreive to hand, etc.) doesn't really matter to me. We have fun, kill lots of birds, and I don't believe we leave much on the table. I think I could spend a lot of money on a dog bred purely for hunting such as a GSP, Brittany, etc. and I wouldn't kill any more birds that I do now (with the added downside of a dog that is way to springy/high strung for my liking in and out of the field). I've got the luxury of a flexible work schedule that allows me to get out hunting 40-50 x throughout the course of the season, so these dogs have the benefit of being on birds ALOT. I do next to nothing as far as field training, other than basic obedience and trust (I know they are never going to run off, chase a deer, etc.). Outside of that, it's all just getting them hunting. If I didn't get out near as much, I'm sure it may be worth getting more of a purebred hunting dog with more natural pedigree.
This leads me to my question.. how do you judge a good hunting dog? In my case, I very much have a "good enough" mindset