kansasbrittany
Banned
Yes it does. The areas I went to last year were overrun with more people than I had seen EVER. I'll preface this with the fact I have always hunted the area since I lived there a few years back so my trips last year were not influenced by the internet chatter.
A lot of the traffic I believe had to do with the internet. :thumbsup:
I hate getting into this, but can't seem to leave it alone
First, yes the internet affects areas. I for one never thought I was doing any harm by giving fairly specific locales b/c I always thought, "What kind of silly....would go to an area based on my report?" How naive/stupid I was The area I hunt was infiltrated with ppl over the next couple of years and it is still full of 'em.
That being said, I always assumed that as more and more ppl came to this site, they'd tell success stories from all over the state, thus spreading the pressure out over the 80 counties that you can shoot a rooster in. Again, I was wrong. If EVERYONE named the counties they've had success in, an internet scouter would be confused. There are at least 40 counties in KS that you can have a good pheasant hunt in and probably another 20 that I'd consider decent. Emil, I'm with you buddy, I wish we could be more specific. KSHusker, I'm also with you in that the internet scouting/reporting does affect certain areas negatively.
NW, SW, NC, SC, NE, SE probably isn't too much information, though when a guy says I hunted WIHA N of Hays, internet scouters probably tend to go to the first cluster of WIHA they see N of Hays. I wish I'd never mentioned the counties I love so dearly. Those that have went to those counties solely based on my reports have certainly been disappointed though for various reasons. Eventually they'll do as I did and find their own places to hunt. In the mean time, the masses have enlightened me of my poor decision making and willingness to share as a fault.