Well that looks like a waste of $160 !
I just called Los Banos. They have been releasing pheasant around Thanksgiving for decades. This year they don't have the money. Asked about the junior hunt at O'Neill Forebay which has also been going on for decades. They will have a hunt on Sunday but only a junior clean up Monday. Their will be a clean up on Tuesday if the coyotes have left anything.
The really sad part is I searched for the junior hunt and didn't find anything, as probably many juniors did too. Last year they had SIX, count 'em, SIX juniors show up and 65 guys show up Monday for the clean up.
Anyone know of an area that did save their budget for a Thanksgiving pheasant release?
(I know- it's beyond sad that we have to rely on released birds to work our dogs but right now it's the only game in town- or is it?)
The Salt Slough check station guys told us that the costs of the reared birds has doubled from $6 per bird to $12 per bird, which was evidently one of the death blows to the Los Banos program when added to all the other things working against it.
Stepping back and looking at it from afar, I kind of realized about five years ago that pheasant hunting on the refuges and wildlife areas was very slowly headed for extinction, due to all the factors that have been repeatedly cited on this forum. When 65 guys converge on released restaurant birds, you know the spirit of that hunting and the hunt itself are doomed for extinction. The issues that California Fish and Wildlife (still feels weird to use that name in an indirect capitulation to HSUS) are experiencing may also point to a potential underlying issue with our governmental structure in California. The recession may be over in a lot of America, but I think we are still dealing with the foundation of the issues in California. In spite of the deflation that has been going on, in spite of the rise of state income, we still have fundamental structural issues with getting money to the people that are actually doing the real work and the projects - past, present and future - that make a difference. In my hometown of Santa Cruz, we were presented with another set of property tax raises by the different school districts, on top of past school district property tax raises that are already in place. The claim is that the state refuses to cough up the funds they are supposed to be floating back to the school districts after collecting taxes. Why the hell hasn't anyone beat up on the state for that kind of crap, instead of coming back to the local taxpayers with hands outstretched? I personally think my local school teachers are underfunded and the extracurricular school programs have all but disappeared, so I don't begrudge them that money. But it does point to an issue with the overall system of how tax monies are collected, distributed and then applied to the programs to which we think they are supposed to be applied.
What does this have to with pheasant hunting in California? Everything and nothing I guess. The fundamental governmental and budgetary structural issues that got us into the current mess haven't really changed. We have a so-called balanced budget, but the way the money flows is byzantine and seems to end up in the hands of administrators and strange pet projects. I would love to see an audit of the California Upland Stamp funds to see the how the money is actually being spent.
And I was talking about just state wildlife refuges. There is always the federal refuges if you really want to see some serious mismanagement of public hunting opportunities. Anybody here remember duck and pheasant hunting at Sutter in the old days? The water and vegetation management at that refuge is absolutely awful these days and has pretty much killed what was once a decent hunting place. And the issues there pre-date the current drought. It really is a management issue in my opinion.
What has been blowing me away during these times of lean funding is how at odds the the hunting communities can be when it comes to money and management of wetlands. I have always maintained that healthy wetland and adjacent upland management is good for both ducks and pheasants, as well as everything else that is trying to survive in that environment. Everyone with a vested interest in wetland health should be coming together to work on wetland projects and to make sure that the money isn't squandered on administrative costs. The benefits to all wetlands species will come out of the wash if people combine forces and focus on the health of the wetland.
Sorry to be such a downer. I have been thinking about this stuff a lot, both for my consulting business and for my long term choices of where to live. It doesn't mean we have to give up, but the tide of parameters that are crushing wild pheasant hunting on public lands seems to be steadily rising.
On a more upbeat note, I have noticed that the ground is moist and the vegetation is not very dusty on the wildlife areas and refuges, in huge contrast to last November. Decent scenting conditions, at least for my inexperienced Lab. Now we just need a bunch of crazy wild tie-dyed chickens running around in the grass! Regardless, my Lab and I will be participating in the self-abuse that appears to be the norm for California wild pheasant public-land hunting.