Downtown Bang!
Member
I thought MN would rank higher on the lists of many
This is a pheasant website so that weighs heavy. I will say Pheasants were reasonably plentiful in MN during the mid to lates 2000's and MN has good amounts of public land available but it's not destination pheasant hunting IMO.
I suppose it could be a destination if a guy really enjoyed hunting huge tracts of cattails, patches of red willow and small tracts of rank Brome grass all day long. That is pretty much what most of the MN public access consists of for pheasant habitat.
Don't get me wrong I've taken my share of MN public land pheasants and enjoyed it but much prefer the variety of habitat I can hit on any given day in South Dakota. If a guy scouts well and is willing to drive a little you can hunt cattails, shelterbelts, head high CRP grass, short grass prairie, standing crops, weed patches and fence rows all in one day in SD and all via public access.
To the original question I would rank the states based on three criteria. High quality public access options. Pheasant population. Legitimate opportunities for bonus upland species within the huntable pheasant range. Will also only rank states I've actually hunted in.
1. South Dakota - Best combination of Pheasants & Access. Good opportunities for Sharptail if a guy knows where to go and when.
2. Kansas - Very good WIA program. Have hunted areas where I flushed pheasants, bobs and some realy spooky GPC's in the same day.
3. North Dakota - Actually has better options for upland species variety than SD but I think pheasants are going to be down for the foreseeable future and frankly the residents are not that welcoming of non-resident hunters.
4. Minnesota - We qualify on all three criteria but IMO none of them score above average.
5. Wisconsin - I once did see a single Woodcock and shot a pheasant on public ground on the same day in Wisconsin.
DB