Range-Pointing Dog

Setternut- I know of a person who peppered another who peppered his dog-

one was never allowed to hunt with us

hey- you have a real good dog- handles, holds till flush, backs within reasonable distance- every single time- does not move on the point or the back- and never needs to be "stimulated" by the ecollar- that's a pretty good dog-

I'd put my Britt's in the field with such a dog- no matter if such dog was a firebreather or a bootpolisher

I like your post- you wouldn't mind if I came up and asked you to join me and my Britt's for a bit of hunting- out of respect you would leave your ecollar off Ace- or at least leave the handheld unit in your vehicle
 
Last edited:
I have never allowed my Britt's to put their nose to the gound to track- I pull them off- I've seen a pointer track and point 10 times on a wounded roosters

So I don't have all of mine steady to wing and shot- is that so bad- to perfectionists- probably

disobeyed!!- of course mine have- they aren't robots- I should have a shock collar on them so I can shock them when they aren't perfect
you have kids- correct

Well, you talk about how great your dogs are and how well trained they are, yet they aren't even trained to the level that would allow them to compete at the AKC or AF level. Its kind of hypocritical to bash someone because you "think" they can't control their dogs without an ecollar, when your dogs dont even point birds with full manners. See what Im getting at? I don't have to hack at my dog or constantly hit her with the collar when Im foot hunting her. She understands the range I want and hunts accordingly. My dog is a 100-300 yard dog off foot with the occasional cast at 300+. But then again, in some of the thick cover we have down here in the south she is a 25-100 yard dog. It all depends on the cover... Now, get on a horse, and its a totally different story. Shes perfectly happy hanging at 350+ with casts well past 500+ yards. While my dog is not a true All Age dog, she qualified for the AA Nationals recently running against the best brits in the country.. Yet when I foot hunt her, she's just a regular hunting dog... My dog isn't special in that regard. There are a lot of dogs who can run off horse one day at 400+ yards, and be hunted off foot the next day... BTW.. The American Brittany Club Amateur Gun Dog Nationals, is a walking trial... So you can't reallly tell me a good trial dog can't be hunted off foot. Especially when 2 years ago a really nice dog from GA won both the Open horseback Gun Dog Nationals AND the Amateur Gun Dog Nationals in the same year.
 
Last edited:
I say white, you say black. I'm in my late 50's. I am acutely aware of barbaric practices used on birdogs, horses and darn near everything else in the good old days. Don't think some of that doesn't go on today. Through all that, many of us raised, coached, and produced birddogs equal to any today. Espousing an alternative to electronic gizmos, does not make one a proponent of the harsh methods of the past. My point all along, has been that it's possible to raise great dogs, who never need a collar, so why buy one that does? I will say it another way, a collar is a crutch, for a lack of either knowledge or time. If you guys are running broke dogs on collars than your dog isn't broke, period. It's broke to the collar but not to you or the bird. A broke dog bumps a bird, and it happens, the broke dog knows the difference and the right and wrong of it. Once even twice is an accident, not a pattern. That dog doesn't need you to light him up, I have always given the dog the benefit of the doubt. If a dog takes steps on the flush or shot, take them back, set them up, whoa re-enforce the stop. Lots of hunters don't want steady to wing because it slows down the dogs pursuit of cripples. It's not as emotionally satisfying maybe, not as instant, but it sure works. I think it's really silly to espouse the fact that a 3 + year old dog needs an e-collar. If it does you either failed trainer 101, paid a heck of a lot to a shade tree trainer, or need a different dog. Seriously, after the derby years, dog training is conditioning and experience, training fundamentals are set in stone, what you have is what you get. That's why I believe that e-collars are basically pacifiers for dog handlers who don't have enough confidence to run or hunt without one. There are dogs who are hard headed, some young dogs are wild and out of control, hell there's a reasonable number of pointing dogs who seem to be born with no natural point, my salient point to all this is WHY mess with them. Go find a dog that will handle, with a nose, with a lot of stop, form a partnership with that dog, you won't need an e-collar. Now if your a pro with 20+ dogs in the string, you really don't have a relationship with any of them, so maybe you need an e-collar to substitute for the natural respect you earn over time in a working relationship. We have to do everything quick these days! I'll leave that one to you. Range which was the original subject, is merely a feature of confidence by the dog in you and you in the dog. You can always tell at a trial, the confident dog/handler, quietly go about the task, in contrast with the whistle blowers, hollerers, frantic scouts trying to keep the dog on the course. while I'm at it, I went to a brittany trial, (espanuel britton), in the south of France, a VDD trial in Germany in the 1980's. Neither were horseback affairs, all foot handled, and gallery a foot, took off across country for miles with dogs searching for huns in France.
VDD spent a lot of time on fur, and tracking. I came to the conclusion then that the european/continental dogs have no business being horseback handled, they aren't bred or intended for it. Sure they can adapt , but why destroy the unique characteristics of a breed by trying to make everything a english pointer? Reality is at the pinacle of the trial game, if all breeds ran together, the e-pointers, with an occasional setter would win consistently. Now if your going to tell me about Billy Bob's fun trial where two shorthairs and a britt won over pointers, I not impressed, I'm talking open all age FDSB, Master's, or a National Championship course at Ames. In those trials a good pointer will beat a great britt, or any other breed. So what do we prove with the various wannabe trials patterned after these, that we have the "big league" and the minors? Like I say, I appreciate a big going dog, want to talk trials and trial accomplishments, go get an all age pointer and get at least day money at an open-all age FDSB Championship. Don't tell me your dog was the AA player of the year in the Pacific coast league. As far as range is concerned in hunting, it's all relative to the terrain, cover, type of gamebird, and experience and capability of the dog. I don't want to trip over a dog, or have one walking on my heels, but if a dog is energetically hunting, staying to the front, covering ground, I'm happy if he's 30 yards out or 1/2mile. It's like art, I may not be able to explain it, but I know it when I see it!
 
Last edited:
like I said- I hunt 2-4 at a time- they all back- we expect any other dog on the ground with us to do likewise

we don't get on the ground with dogs with shock collars



never said otherwise-but take that ecollar off- and it's kind of obvious if one has a good dog or not

I'll meet you for a PC hunt- you put 2 down I'll put 2 down- no "ecollars" you want to put 3 down I'll put 3 down

I just wanted to post before the thread got deleted.

:D

And thanks, but no thanks. It just doesn't sound like fun at all.
 
I just wanted to post before the thread got deleted.

:D

And thanks, but no thanks. It just doesn't sound like fun at all.

V-John, it was a good thread. Only a matter of time before something like this happened. I'm sure we could start it again next fall, and get a few good pages of reading in before this crap resurfaces. Your response to this nonsense is classy:cheers:

For the record and back on topic, I'm too nervous to let mine out as far as you let yours out. I didn't mind their range a bit, but that's only b/c I'm not responsible for getting them home safely. I can only imagine you've had Riley (Rowdy...dangit, forgot his name; the older male) on point, 1/4 mile away for 10-20 minutes while you walk to find him. That would be a dandy relationship, but my nerves couldn't take it:)
 
Here's what I don't understand. If you don't use ecollars, great. If you don't use Garmins, great. But I don't understand the fact that we have to run down those that do use them. I strap both Garmin and E-collar on all three of the dogs. Do I shock the dog to turn them? No. Do I shock them to bring them in? No. But all of a sudden because I use an ecollar I don't have a relationship with my dog and they aren't trained and I have failed "trainer 101".



I like to have a sense of security. If I'm hunting, I want to be able to keep their manners up and sharp. I don't want them taking steps.

Things happen. They aren't perfect, and neither am I.

I can tell you two things though. You'll be hard pressed to find someone with a better relationship with his dogs then me. Riley sleeps underneath the covers in the crook of my legs or by my chest every night for over six years. Grady has slept at the end of the bed. Sis likes it underneath the covers too.

I'm 33, and I've seen guys pepper their dogs with their shotguns. I was embarassed for the guy. Not because of what his dog was doing, but what he did. It's rare that I'm ever embarassed for what a dog does.
 
Here's what I don't understand. If you don't use ecollars, great. If you don't use Garmins, great. But I don't understand the fact that we have to run down those that do use them. I strap both Garmin and E-collar on all three of the dogs. Do I shock the dog to turn them? No. Do I shock them to bring them in? No. But all of a sudden because I use an ecollar I don't have a relationship with my dog and they aren't trained and I have failed "trainer 101".



I like to have a sense of security. If I'm hunting, I want to be able to keep their manners up and sharp. I don't want them taking steps.

Things happen. They aren't perfect, and neither am I.

I can tell you two things though. You'll be hard pressed to find someone with a better relationship with his dogs then me. Riley sleeps underneath the covers in the crook of my legs or by my chest every night for over six years. Grady has slept at the end of the bed. Sis likes it underneath the covers too.

I'm 33, and I've seen guys pepper their dogs with their shotguns. I was embarassed for the guy. Not because of what his dog was doing, but what he did. It's rare that I'm ever embarassed for what a dog does.

Same Shadow different forum.....

I agree with John one hundred percent, his dogs AREN'T perfect. ;) In all seriousness though. Just because I don't care for forefetch doesn't mean that it isn't a great training method and those that use it are subpar trainers. I would never fault someone that does it, it just isn't my cup of tea. It should be the same way with this topic as well. So long as our dogs bring each of us satisfication what does it really matter?

So about this range thing.......
 
Some of the things mentioned makes me think of a man man I knew that is no longer with us. He was born in 1905 and he had trained hounds for coons. He never abused them and had they listened to him and responded to every command he gave.I know it's completely different type of hunting but it made me think of him on some of the comments made on this thread.I only seen him get rough and abusive with one dog.It was because the guy he bought the from had made it real mean and it went after my friend's wife.He had a 2 gallon galvinized in his hand and hit the dog up side the head with it to stop it from doing any harm.Once this happened the dog did not act aggressive towards his wife towards his or myself. He worked with the dog to get that problem resolved And it ended up being the best dog he had.It got to where it he could trust the dog off the leash without going after anybody to do bodily harm to them,except for the person he bought the dog from.That was the only person it would go after fromthat point on.It's just because the way he treated it and the dog remembered it and had to be tied every time he was around and wanted to do serious body harm to him.This is not the first time I've seen something like this done. The guy that worked with this dog told me if a guy gets too abusive with a dog it will turn on him.He told me he seen it happen twice and did not turn out very good for either one.
 
Range

JetJockey: I appreciate the way you think. I never put a dog down without a Tracking collar. I sometimes put one down with a E-Collar. But my use is very limited with this. After all they are only dog's and I have seen dogs dissappear right in front of my nose and I like the comfort of being able to know where they are.
OldandNew: I only use an E-Collar for one thing at a time. I'm not looking to get in a dog's head and have him wondering what he's supposed to do. An E-Collar is only used after all the ground work and the learning has been taken care of. It is never a negative reinforcement (except Deer chasing) when used. My worst fear is not coming back with the dog when out hunting. The tracker helps with that.
I compete heavily in AKC & AF Field Trials with my dogs so manners are a key. Are there FT dog's that don't back? Oh Yeah. Not those that win consistently though.
We hunt tight cover here in my area and control when hunting can be a challenge at time. Especially when getting on state land. My joy is working the dog's while hunting. The birds are secondary, but a necessary evil so to speak.
We are all in agreement that the fun of hunting behind a good bird dog is the way to go.
I'm looking to get out into Montana this fall and not run some of the bigger FT events in the midwest the latter part of the fall. Good bird dogs are made on wild birds and being hunted and not a constant pounding of pen raised birds in their face. I'm hoping for some success. Have a good fall guys.
 
I say white, you say black. I'm in my late 50's. I am acutely aware of barbaric practices used on birdogs, horses and darn near everything else in the good old days. Don't think some of that doesn't go on today. Through all that, many of us raised, coached, and produced birddogs equal to any today. Espousing an alternative to electronic gizmos, does not make one a proponent of the harsh methods of the past. My point all along, has been that it's possible to raise great dogs, who never need a collar, so why buy one that does? I will say it another way, a collar is a crutch, for a lack of either knowledge or time. If you guys are running broke dogs on collars than your dog isn't broke, period. It's broke to the collar but not to you or the bird. A broke dog bumps a bird, and it happens, the broke dog knows the difference and the right and wrong of it. Once even twice is an accident, not a pattern. That dog doesn't need you to light him up, I have always given the dog the benefit of the doubt. If a dog takes steps on the flush or shot, take them back, set them up, whoa re-enforce the stop. Lots of hunters don't want steady to wing because it slows down the dogs pursuit of cripples. It's not as emotionally satisfying maybe, not as instant, but it sure works. I think it's really silly to espouse the fact that a 3 + year old dog needs an e-collar. If it does you either failed trainer 101, paid a heck of a lot to a shade tree trainer, or need a different dog. Seriously, after the derby years, dog training is conditioning and experience, training fundamentals are set in stone, what you have is what you get. That's why I believe that e-collars are basically pacifiers for dog handlers who don't have enough confidence to run or hunt without one. There are dogs who are hard headed, some young dogs are wild and out of control, hell there's a reasonable number of pointing dogs who seem to be born with no natural point, my salient point to all this is WHY mess with them. Go find a dog that will handle, with a nose, with a lot of stop, form a partnership with that dog, you won't need an e-collar. Now if your a pro with 20+ dogs in the string, you really don't have a relationship with any of them, so maybe you need an e-collar to substitute for the natural respect you earn over time in a working relationship. We have to do everything quick these days! I'll leave that one to you. Range which was the original subject, is merely a feature of confidence by the dog in you and you in the dog. You can always tell at a trial, the confident dog/handler, quietly go about the task, in contrast with the whistle blowers, hollerers, frantic scouts trying to keep the dog on the course. while I'm at it, I went to a brittany trial, (espanuel britton), in the south of France, a VDD trial in Germany in the 1980's. Neither were horseback affairs, all foot handled, and gallery a foot, took off across country for miles with dogs searching for huns in France.
VDD spent a lot of time on fur, and tracking. I came to the conclusion then that the european/continental dogs have no business being horseback handled, they aren't bred or intended for it. Sure they can adapt , but why destroy the unique characteristics of a breed by trying to make everything a english pointer? Reality is at the pinacle of the trial game, if all breeds ran together, the e-pointers, with an occasional setter would win consistently. Now if your going to tell me about Billy Bob's fun trial where two shorthairs and a britt won over pointers, I not impressed, I'm talking open all age FDSB, Master's, or a National Championship course at Ames. In those trials a good pointer will beat a great britt, or any other breed. So what do we prove with the various wannabe trials patterned after these, that we have the "big league" and the minors? Like I say, I appreciate a big going dog, want to talk trials and trial accomplishments, go get an all age pointer and get at least day money at an open-all age FDSB Championship. Don't tell me your dog was the AA player of the year in the Pacific coast league. As far as range is concerned in hunting, it's all relative to the terrain, cover, type of gamebird, and experience and capability of the dog. I don't want to trip over a dog, or have one walking on my heels, but if a dog is energetically hunting, staying to the front, covering ground, I'm happy if he's 30 yards out or 1/2mile. It's like art, I may not be able to explain it, but I know it when I see it!

Wow.. Where to start. First off, an e-collar is nothing more then a check cord. Simple as that. Why do people use them, and 90% of most pro's? Because they work, and you can train a dog in half the time. You call it a shortcut, Ill agree. Its a shortcut that works, and gets a dog trained much, much quicker. Do dogs that get trained on a check cord need a check cord in the field? Nope. Do dogs that get trained with en e-collar need one in the field? Nope. But isn't it nice to have that reasurance? My dog has an e-collar on her everywhere she runs, yet she doesn't need it. The proof of that is in her trial wins and the fact she was a FC by 2 1/2, when most likely, your still breaking your dogs....... As far as the majors vs the minors in the field trial world. Your correct, the pinnacle of the trail world is the 3 hr trial at Ames. For the most part, there is no other dogs (setters included) who can keep up with a Pointer for 3 hours. Make it a 1 1/2 hr trial, and now you have a completely different story. Another interesting thing about other breeds competing with EP's. In NSTRA, the winningest dog in history is a Brittany, that dog went against EP's at every single trial it ran. That dog is also the first dog in their hall of fame... As far as Ames goes, I guess we will all get to see how all the breeds stack up in a more realistic 1 hr trial this spring. The AKC is holding the AKC Gun Dog National Championships at Ames right after AF is holding thier AA champoinships. There will be plenty of dual registered Brits, EP's, ES's, GSP's, and all the rest of the AKC breeds at that trial. It will be the best dual registered AKC Gun Dogs and AF Shooting Dogs in the country going head to head. The biggest baddest AA brits and GSP's won't be running, and either will the biggest and baddest EP's. There is 132 spots open to qualified dogs. Should be a pretty good measuring stick that will force the judges to have an open mind and not single out certain breeds because they don't have a tail.. Im hoping to watch a few braces at the end of the AF Nationals before the AKC Nationals start. From what Ive heard, Ames isn't really that open, so it will be fun to compare the run between the AF AA dogs and the AKC GD's on the same exact grounds.
 
Last edited:
I say white, you say black. I'm in my late 50's. I am acutely aware of barbaric practices used on birdogs, horses and darn near everything else in the good old days. Don't think some of that doesn't go on today. Through all that, many of us raised, coached, and produced birddogs equal to any today. Espousing an alternative to electronic gizmos, does not make one a proponent of the harsh methods of the past. My point all along, has been that it's possible to raise great dogs, who never need a collar, so why buy one that does? I will say it another way, a collar is a crutch, for a lack of either knowledge or time. If you guys are running broke dogs on collars than your dog isn't broke, period. It's broke to the collar but not to you or the bird. A broke dog bumps a bird, and it happens, the broke dog knows the difference and the right and wrong of it. Once even twice is an accident, not a pattern. That dog doesn't need you to light him up, I have always given the dog the benefit of the doubt. If a dog takes steps on the flush or shot, take them back, set them up, whoa re-enforce the stop. Lots of hunters don't want steady to wing because it slows down the dogs pursuit of cripples.

oldandnew

I pretty much agree with the things you are saying. Just because you don't use an e-collar doesn't mean you approve of harsh methods. My point was in response to my impression the old ways were less harsh. In each era there are misguided people that use harsh methods. I do not believe in harsh training.

I use an e-collar at times during training. But using your example on a dog taking steps, I do the same thing. Put the dog back and work on standing. I don't go to the collar as a first step. Most of the time he will stop without a collar stimulation, I put him back, we do it again. No different than if he was on a CC. He might take a step, but stop on his own, I am not going to yank him off his feet with a CC. There is no need for that. I get the feeling that some people think the e-collars are used to severely "shock" the dog. If you are doing that you have not done the foundation work well enough, and need to slow down and get the foundation in place.

No matter what you are using in your training method, you have to be fair to the dog. They have to understand the rules, respect those rules, or they will never make a polished bird dog.

But I have seen plenty of broke dogs hunt/trial with and without collars. The collar doesn't make a broke dog any more than wearing a collar means the dog isn't broke. Its not about the collar.

This has been a great thread. Lots of reasonable and different points of view, and a few with logic that I did not follow.
 
sorry you feel that way about a meeting VJohn- can understand- I come across wrong to everyone

I've only requested my bird dogs to stay inside 1/4 mile- been pretty sucessful for 30 years-

meaning was wrong- should have been- I'm not against ecollars- have always said- how would ones who rely on them have done in the 70's- so the statement- take the ecollar off and see-

regret- think my Britt's would have enjoyed a day in the field with your V's
 
sorry you feel that way about a meeting VJohn- can understand- I come across wrong to everyone

I've only requested my bird dogs to stay inside 1/4 mile- been pretty sucessful for 30 years-

meaning was wrong- should have been- I'm not against ecollars- have always said- how would ones who rely on them have done in the 70's- so the statement- take the ecollar off and see-

regret- think my Britt's would have enjoyed a day in the field with your V's

I use my collar mainly for locating purposes nowadays. The beeper option comes in very handy for locating in heavy cover. Just a quick press of the button lets me know where the dog is. Very seldom do I... personally... need to use it for correction purposes. But... you never know when a half mile leash will come in handy, for whatever reason. :)
 
I say white, you say black. I'm in my late 50's. I am acutely aware of barbaric practices used on birdogs, horses and darn near everything else in the good old days. Don't think some of that doesn't go on today. Through all that, many of us raised, coached, and produced birddogs equal to any today. Espousing an alternative to electronic gizmos, does not make one a proponent of the harsh methods of the past. My point all along, has been that it's possible to raise great dogs, who never need a collar, so why buy one that does? I will say it another way, a collar is a crutch, for a lack of either knowledge or time. If you guys are running broke dogs on collars than your dog isn't broke, period. It's broke to the collar but not to you or the bird. A broke dog bumps a bird, and it happens, the broke dog knows the difference and the right and wrong of it. Once even twice is an accident, not a pattern. That dog doesn't need you to light him up, I have always given the dog the benefit of the doubt. If a dog takes steps on the flush or shot, take them back, set them up, whoa re-enforce the stop. Lots of hunters don't want steady to wing because it slows down the dogs pursuit of cripples. It's not as emotionally satisfying maybe, not as instant, but it sure works. I think it's really silly to espouse the fact that a 3 + year old dog needs an e-collar. If it does you either failed trainer 101, paid a heck of a lot to a shade tree trainer, or need a different dog. Seriously, after the derby years, dog training is conditioning and experience, training fundamentals are set in stone, what you have is what you get. That's why I believe that e-collars are basically pacifiers for dog handlers who don't have enough confidence to run or hunt without one. There are dogs who are hard headed, some young dogs are wild and out of control, hell there's a reasonable number of pointing dogs who seem to be born with no natural point, my salient point to all this is WHY mess with them. Go find a dog that will handle, with a nose, with a lot of stop, form a partnership with that dog, you won't need an e-collar. Now if your a pro with 20+ dogs in the string, you really don't have a relationship with any of them, so maybe you need an e-collar to substitute for the natural respect you earn over time in a working relationship. We have to do everything quick these days! I'll leave that one to you. Range which was the original subject, is merely a feature of confidence by the dog in you and you in the dog. You can always tell at a trial, the confident dog/handler, quietly go about the task, in contrast with the whistle blowers, hollerers, frantic scouts trying to keep the dog on the course. while I'm at it, I went to a brittany trial, (espanuel britton), in the south of France, a VDD trial in Germany in the 1980's. Neither were horseback affairs, all foot handled, and gallery a foot, took off across country for miles with dogs searching for huns in France.
VDD spent a lot of time on fur, and tracking. I came to the conclusion then that the european/continental dogs have no business being horseback handled, they aren't bred or intended for it. Sure they can adapt , but why destroy the unique characteristics of a breed by trying to make everything a english pointer? Reality is at the pinacle of the trial game, if all breeds ran together, the e-pointers, with an occasional setter would win consistently. Now if your going to tell me about Billy Bob's fun trial where two shorthairs and a britt won over pointers, I not impressed, I'm talking open all age FDSB, Master's, or a National Championship course at Ames. In those trials a good pointer will beat a great britt, or any other breed. So what do we prove with the various wannabe trials patterned after these, that we have the "big league" and the minors? Like I say, I appreciate a big going dog, want to talk trials and trial accomplishments, go get an all age pointer and get at least day money at an open-all age FDSB Championship. Don't tell me your dog was the AA player of the year in the Pacific coast league. As far as range is concerned in hunting, it's all relative to the terrain, cover, type of gamebird, and experience and capability of the dog. I don't want to trip over a dog, or have one walking on my heels, but if a dog is energetically hunting, staying to the front, covering ground, I'm happy if he's 30 yards out or 1/2mile. It's like art, I may not be able to explain it, but I know it when I see it!

you ever get in the SW part of Kansas let me know- hunting season or not-
 
I use my collar mainly for locating purposes nowadays. The beeper option comes in very handy for locating in heavy cover. Just a quick press of the button lets me know where the dog is. Very seldom do I... personally... need to use it for correction purposes. But... you never know when a half mile leash will come in handy, for whatever reason. :)

I used bells and beepers for 30 years in 5 states- then the Garmin came out-
never thought about an ecollar to locate a Britt- yikes- a pinned rooster the Britt is staring at at 3'- BEEP!!!-
 
I can see the value of location features, yikes some of 20 year old crp is pretty wooly! I admit I have seen collars work wonders, in the hands of savvy handlers. I think for the most part they tend to be abit overused, and credited as the solution for all things. It would be a last resort for me, and that might be after a serious rehoming effort, or death do us part, probably mine, chasing the reprobate across three sections might finish me. I think it's a personal predjudice, early on I was exposed to an assortment of nimrods, who had to have the newest, and latest gimmicks, much to the suffering of their dogsand companions. Universally they were a miserable circus to hunt with. This does not imply that I feel that way toward anyone here. All responses have been civil and reasonable, collar or not, I'd share a day with any of you. I am wired a little different, I have an arsenal of autoloders that I shoot very well, yet I shoot old doubles, brass handloads, fiber wads, I'm still regretting getting rid of a 40 year old International truck, because it didn't have catalytic converter, and I didn't have to worry about parking it on the prairie, and starting a wild fire. As you can see electronic add ons aren't really on my menu. I overcame my fear of damaging computers by pushing keys only about 10 years ago! So humor an old stubborn fool. We once upon a time had to get by without all this, we managed, things were simpler, believe it or not we had really good dogs, lots of birds, and we were happy.
 
I have an arsenal of autoloders that I shoot very well, yet I shoot old doubles, brass handloads, fiber wads.

Now weve found something we can 100% agree on, for the most part. Im dying to get my hands on an old LC Smith with steel barrels, but I want something I can shoot modern loads with. A LC Smith in 16 guage with 28 inch barrels would be the perfect nostalgic pheasant gun IMO. I cant imagine the joy Id having killing a wild SD rooster with one.... After that, I need a 28 guage to hunt SE bobs down here in Ga. But Ill probably have to get something a little newer in 28 guage. Finding a good American double in 28 guage can cost a small fortune.
 
Go all the way with the doubles, even if it means brass and black powder. I recently acquired a westley richards percussion double, and I am dickering on a Purdy pinfire. I have owned several L.C. Smith's and believe them to be the queen of the American doubles, I suppose the acknowledged king is Parker, I have a couple of those as well, I shoot the L.C.'s better, the Parkers if not restocked, sometimes have a lot of drop. You can find 20 ga. Foxes, or Ithaca Flues, which weigh around 5.5 #'s make dandy quail guns, need 2 1/2 inch light loads.
 
We have pretty well run the range and e-collar topic to the end of the race,
So what will be another good topic to run with for the next 10 pages :)

Don't know that we can get 10 pages out of shotguns, but its worth a shot.

I have never liked the sight picture with a SxS, but I picked up an AyA at Cabela's in Sidney yesterday that was one fine pointing gun. They had it in 16, 20, and 28 ga. for $3500.

The 1100 20ga I bought in high-school is the best shooting gun for me, my son has cabbaged on to it. But my 20 ga O/U is a close 2nd.
 
@Setternut How about best all around gun for it's money or sometinglike that. Could get a few pages out of the that possibly.Like which one you would use for upland birds,turkey and deer.
 
Back
Top