Dog breed question

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think you might be misled..albeit everyone is entitled to their own opinion. To say labradors are chiefly retrievers is a massive understatement. I have used labs for primarily for upland hunting and on wild birds I would personally take a flusher over a pointer any day. My labs would take a day chasing pheasants in the field over sitting in a blind retrieving ducks any day as well. I think that comment is way off.. I think the retrieving aspect you refer to is based more on that being what they are best at..retrieving game..but they are EXCELLENT hunters..atleast the ones that were trained to do so and the ones i have hunted behind.

Your comment saying in most cases you dont even need a lab for that what they bring to the table might win an award for the most ignorant comment yet on the forum.

congrats. :10sign:


I think youre somewhat misled.
I like Labs, alot.
But they are chiefly retrievers. Not hunters.
In their 'native' lands of Britain, the English Cockers and Springers do all the rough work, and the Labs the game pickup. Its about efficiency.
Much is true in the states here. Sure, You can use them for pheasant and cattaill and field drives, and they do an adequate job. But not stellar. Most times you dont even need a dog for what they bring to the table.

Faults: They run very 'hot', tire above 50F after an hour or so of work, are average only on cripples, and lack adequate range in open country.
For Grouse of any kind, outside of opening day fool hens, theyre not really a breed of choice. Sorry if this offends, but I think its true.


A springer, wachtelhund, boykin is a much better, more tireless and efficient phez dog that a Lab, similar in retrieve dept for most waterfowl work.
And for Pointers, I prefer DKs/GSPs and DDs/GWPs, and PPs.
Roosters run, they are hard to kill, If you value shot game and dont stand losing cripples, get a well bred German or NAVHDA bred dog.
Additionally, youll have a more versatile dog that you can do more with, imo.
Coons, Hogs, Waterfowl, All Upland et al.
 
I had a male yellow Lab back in the mid 80's that was a super dog. He was a lean, mean hunting machine. 65 lbs. of solid muscle. A little leggier and certainly leaner than most Labs I see today. He could do it all, pheasants or waterfowl. He also had a great temperament. My biggest complaint was the shedding. I've had mostly Springers and now Brittanys and they don't shed a fraction of what that Lab did.

For the most part all my dogs, regardless of breed, have turned out to be very good hunters. Besides breeding, I attribute most of that to how much exposure that my dogs get to birds out here in SD. Like I've said before, my dogs probably see more birds in one season than a lot of dogs see in a lifetime.

jarbo, I told you I almost bought a WPG 5 years ago and if I get another dog the WPG will be on my short list.


You won't be disappointed. You said it exactly, bird exposure is the key.

My lab was as good if not better than any other dog I've seen when it came to pheasant in thick cover, and amazing in uncut milo. As I started hunting further west and made trips to MT for sharpies, he was less effective than the pointing dogs. As others have said, the desire for downed birds was crazy.

Have seen some nice Munsterlanders at NAVHDA tests also, after a griff not sure I can go back to a long haired dog.
 
Ive seen Vizsla Seeing eye dogs in my state!
High energy..yes.
Biters of children? Dont think so. I call bs

I was only trying to relay info to the OP. I am sorry if this offends you! I am here to help.

Now I am here to cause problems (sorry mods I should take the high ground) I call ignorance with a whole bunch of BS on your lab bashing thread

Steve Goetze
 
I was only trying to relay info to the OP. I am sorry if this offends you! I am here to help.

Now I am here to cause problems (sorry mods I should take the high ground) I call ignorance with a whole bunch of BS on your lab bashing thread

Steve Goetze


It doesn't help to post unsubstantiated claims that V dogs are biters. I'm not buying that at all. They are great family dogs.
 
I had a male yellow Lab back in the mid 80's that was a super dog. He was a lean, mean hunting machine. 65 lbs. of solid muscle. A little leggier and certainly leaner than most Labs I see today. He could do it all, pheasants or waterfowl. He also had a great temperament. My biggest complaint was the shedding. I've had mostly Springers and now Brittanys and they don't shed a fraction of what that Lab did.

For the most part all my dogs, regardless of breed, have turned out to be very good hunters. Besides breeding, I attribute most of that to how much exposure that my dogs get to birds out here in SD. Like I've said before, my dogs probably see more birds in one season than a lot of dogs see in a lifetime.

jarbo, I told you I almost bought a WPG 5 years ago and if I get another dog the WPG will be on my short list.

That's a great point zeb. Birds, wild birds, make dogs. I have had the opportunity to hunt 10-15 days a year in sd on good private land. My dog has a years worth of good contact each couple of days. After 3 or 4 years a well bred dog will get very good. Anyone who says you will get the same amount of birds with or without a lab doesn't know much about dogs or pheasants IMO. No offense:D
 
all figured out

That's a great point zeb. Birds, wild birds, make dogs. I have had the opportunity to hunt 10-15 days a year in sd on good private land. My dog has a years worth of good contact each couple of days. After 3 or 4 years a well bred dog will get very good. Anyone who says you will get the same amount of birds with or without a lab doesn't know much about dogs or pheasants IMO. No offense:D
I don't have a dog in this fight you guys have it all figured out. ha ha www.wesslpointer.com
 
I have no dog in this fight and I regret even getting involved. I am out, and somewhat amazed that I am in investing additional effort.

To all: please read my original post. Take what you want from it and move on.
I honestly was trying to be helpful. To the OP good luck finding the Right breed for you.

Steve Goetze
 
Good god, no one can take a joke anymore. LOL:D I just find it funny all the time that no matter what breed anyone asks about. The flabradore crowd comes out of the woodwork. I was just joking with you flabradore guys. :) To the OP I would lean toward the Brittney. It has spaniel in it's name. Since he was asking about a few "Poniter" breeds to begin with. LOL Settle down fellas just joking. I think that the labradoodle is one of the best things to hit the ground. No shedding.:D
 
Best thing to do is find some good breeders of the few "POINTER" dogs he asked about and go see them at the place. Watch them work, see how they get along with you your kids etc. Make an informed decision, driving the car so to speak.:thumbsup:
 
To the OP, keep in mind ownership costs as well. For example, if you go with a pointer, when it starts to get cold out you'll need to buy some doggie sweaters. :p

Check your health insurance coverages as well. The hearing aids you'll need after several years of listening to beeper collars may not be covered. :D
 
To the OP, keep in mind ownership costs as well. For example, if you go with a pointer, when it starts to get cold out you'll need to buy some doggie sweaters. :p

Check your health insurance coverages as well. The hearing aids you'll need after several years of listening to beeper collars may not be covered. :D

Wow now that's funny. Like hunting next to a backing bread truck all day. Not to mention the satellite tracking devices. More like playing a video game than hunting:D


Ps. FCS it wasn't your post that brought out the Lab guy's, we learned to ignore your flabadore crap along time ago:D
 
Last edited:
To the OP, keep in mind ownership costs as well. For example, if you go with a pointer, when it starts to get cold out you'll need to buy some doggie sweaters. :p

Check your health insurance coverages as well. The hearing aids you'll need after several years of listening to beeper collars may not be covered. :D

Lmao. :cheers::cheers:
 
the comment labs " are only average on cripples" made me laugh out loud, no dog is better on cripples than a lab...none

I have shorthairs, English pointers and a boykin all good breeds but none hold a candle to a lab when it comes to hunting down cripples.

Ill point you to a UKC HRC NAHRA test back in the 1990s when they actually had a cripple test. The results were so horrifying they did away with it.
27 dogs entered, Finished dogs.
25 Labs, 1 Golden ( I think) and 1 Drahthaar- Ali Vom Backwater.
Tough windy conditions.
25 Labs failed that day, swm in circles on the cripple test of the duck, no handling allowed. The Drahthaar and Golden passed. Drahthaar was my next dog. YOu can confirm all of this with UKC/ NAHRA.


Labs retrieve sight birds very well, cripples not so much, and why many lab folks are getting away from them..
See here:


vom Altmoor Deutsch-Drahthaars

Q - I'm a waterfowl hunter, and only a waterfowl hunter. Should I consider a Deutsch-Drahthaar?

A - While at vom Altmoor we do as many different types of hunting as we can fit in, waterfowl hunting is our first love. Dissatisfaction with high cripple losses with our Springers and Labs was one of our primary reasons for switching to the DD.
While we very much respect the incredible levels of obedience and directional control seen in retriever field trials, we want dogs that, regardless of the difficulty of the conditions, will find the cripple that has taken a hidden route two hundred yards from where it went down.
You can't really appreciate what we're talking about until you've watched a DD follow a duck's scent trail across dozens or hundreds of yards of wind-swept open water. What many people don't realize is that the breed started out as a heavy-duty retriever. While the upland capabilities have since been further developed and refined, great emphasis is still placed on game recovery after the shot. Given the great respect of the German hunter for wild game, this should come as no surprise.
 
I think you're somewhat naive with your generalizations here. Have you ever seen a real good upland Lab in action? I'm not talking about one that points, either, but a hard-charging, aggressive flusher that can go all day and still want more when the people are ready to quit? One that has the power to bust the heaviest cover that a rooster can sneak into and an overwhelming desire to do it?

Some of them are indeed "stellar," to use your term, and they'll absolutely put birds in the air that wouldn't be seen without a dog, or even without a dog that wasn't extremely tough and determined -- regardless of the breed. And they'll go after cripples as if their life depends on it.

I know of a kennel that produces such dogs regularly, and I also know of a private breeder who's turned out dozens of them in a line he started more than 30 years ago. They're out there, and they can be found by someone with the desire to find them.

Your stereotypes might be applicable to litters that are available via newspaper classified ads. In the hardcore hunting dog realm, not so much. Sorry if this offends, but I know for a fact that it's true.

Yes, Ive seen those Labs and wouldnt want to own one, save for a select few. I want a balanced animal and we are not seeing that, all sacrificed on the altar of trial ribbons.

Ive run and titled my DD in HRC UKC tests, so I see Labs quite often. Work with some as well.
Pain in the rear end type dogs, even the AKC Sporting Director acknowledges that they are breeding them too hot.






GUNDOG Magazine
American Kennel Club Update

by M.J. Nelson September 23, 2010
The new director of the performance division answers some tough questions.
By M.J. Nelson


Doug Ljungren, the new director of the AKCs Performance Division, with Sure Shots Roxanne.
In March of 2007, there was a changing of the guard in the American Kennel Clubs Performance Division.
Douglas Ljungren was named director of this division, replacing William Speck, who retired after more than 20 years in that position. Ljungren is responsible for all facets of AKC Field Trials and Hunting Tests for retrievers, spaniels, beagles and pointing breeds, as well as herding, lure coursing, earthdog events and the AKCs newest program, titled Working Dog Sport.

Ljungren came to his job with the AKC from the Port of Tacoma in Washington. During the time he worked for the port, it grew from a local port to the sixth largest container port in North America. It was, he said, a very interesting time.
Ljungren grew up in Duluth, Minnesota, where he spent much of his youth being outwitted by ruffed grouse. While he was a student at Iowa State University, from which he holds a masters degree in economics, he spent as much time as possible each fall away from the classroom and studies chasing Iowa ringnecks. While he was in Washington, chukar and quail were his quarry on fall afternoons.
He took over his position at a time when the American Kennel Club is faced with a number of issues, many of which are of great concern to hunters. He recently agreed to address some of these issues with Gun Dog.

Gun Dog: What qualified you to be selected as the new Director of Performance Events? In other words, whats your pedigree?
Doug Ljungren: I have owned, bred, trained and hunted German wirehaired pointers for over 30 years. During the off-season I participated in field trials and hunting tests and occasionally showed the dogs in conformation and obedience events. I very much enjoy working with the dogs and do all my own training and handling.
I was fortunate enough to have finished 11 dogs in the field of which five were dual champions.
Judging at both the local and national level has helped to broaden my perspective. This is one of those evolutions that some dog people experience a hobby turned into a lifetime passion. The job requires a mixture of dog and business knowledge.
My 30-plus years of corporate business experience has been a huge benefit in being prepared for this position. There is much more activity and a much wider range of issues to deal with than I think most people realize. I know I was surprised. Thank goodness the Performance Events Department has such a knowledgeable staff.

GD: Do you have any plans for long- or short-range changes to the hunt test program?
DL: The AKC administers three hunting test programs: one each for retrievers, pointing breeds and spaniels. The programs are over 20 years old. Hunting tests are non-competitive as each dog is judged against a standard of performance. The hunting test program is very popular with over 900 events and 50,000 entries per year.
The events have wide appeal for owners who want to provide an opportunity for their dog to participate in the activity for which it was bred. Many hunters participate in order to keep their dogs trained and in condition between hunting seasons. One of the keys to the success of this program is quality judging and uniformity in the performance standards across the country. AKC field representatives conduct seminars for participants to review the regulations and discuss how to judge a dog?s performance.

AKC periodically holds Advisory Committee meetings to review the test regulations and address other issues that may have arise. In 2007 there was a Pointing Breed Advisory Committee meeting that resulted in some recommended changes to that program. Those changes went info effect at the beginning of 2008. There are no hunting test advisory committee meetings planned for 2008. While we are always discussing ideas internally, AKC has no plans of its own to make any significant changes to any of the hunting test programs at this time.
Many participants provide their thoughts concerning the programs. Suggestions or questions about the hunting test program can be e-mailed to AKC at www.huntingtest@akc.org.

GD: As you are no doubt aware, the retriever field trial and hunt test programs have long been the ?property? of the Labrador Retriever Club of America, in that they have pretty much controlled everything that has happened with either program. Since you are not part of the Labrador world, do you have any plans to include more input from people who represent other retriever breeds in these programs?

DL: There are eight retrieving breeds allowed to participate in the Retriever Hunting Test program. The Retriever Hunting Test Advisory Committee develops recommendations based on their own initiative or based on input from participants and clubs.
These recommendations are then voted on by every licensed retriever club in the U.S. These cubs are open to all retrieving breeds. The Performance Events Department is certainly open to suggestions or questions about the Retriever Hunting Test program. Again, these can be e-mailed to AKC at www.huntingtest@akc.org.


GD: There have been a number of stories in the past few years that contained comments from both professional trainers and hunt test participants charging that hunt tests, by definition non-competitive, are in fact becoming more and more competitive and difficult so that many, perhaps most, of the dogs now require professional training and handling to be successful at anything past the junior levels. Since this was not the original intent of the program, and if these complaints are accurate, what is your response? Do you have any plans to address this issue?

DL: All three hunting test programs (pointing breeds, retrievers and spaniels) are non-competitive events, meaning that each dog either passes or fails depending on how the judges evaluate the dog?s actions against a standard of performance. Each hunting test contains three skill levels?junior, senior or master. The master level is designed to be quite difficult.
There are many people that, given their lifestyle or time availability,
choose to have their dog trained by a professional trainer, especially at the higher levels. There are also many knowledgeable amateur owners who train their dogs and successfully participate in the program.

At AKC we hear from participants that feel the tests are too difficult. We also hear from participants that feel just the opposite. AKC has tracked over time the ratio of entries per title earned at each test level to ensure the tests are not becoming easier or more difficult. This measurement also allows us to compare across the three hunt test programs (retrievers, pointing breeds and spaniels). Our tracking indicates there has been no significant change in the difficulty of the hunting test program over the past 10 years. It also indicates that dogs that enter the retriever test pass slightly more often than in the other two tests.


GD: Many hunters and people who train gun dogs have been unhappy for a number of years with dogs from field trial lines.
Just in the past few months, a number of successful trainers from all three disciplines retriever, pointing breed and spaniel have stated that most field trial line dogs are simply too hot for the average hunter to handle, or, in the case of most field-trial Labs and goldens, too hot-wired to be pleasant companions in the duck blind or the goose pits.

An additional complaint is that the dogs from these lines will run 1000 yards in a straight line but they can?t accurately mark a 30-yard fall. This being the case, where do hunters go to find dogs that are sensible enough and possess the needed traits for real hunting?

DL: A dogs actions while hunting are being influenced by three motivating factors: desire to hunt, willingness to cooperate with the handler, and obedience to the handler. The difficulty facing a breeder or trainer who is attempting to develop a successful field trial dog or a great hunting dog is achieving the proper balance between these three factors.
I believe desire to hunt and willingness to cooperate are primarily inherited. Obedience is primarily trained. Desire to hunt is the engine that drives the dog.
The willingness to cooperate coupled with the degree of obedience is the steering wheel. These traits must be in balance with one another. I dont think a field trial dog or a hunting dog can have too much desire to hunt unless it is out of proportion to the ability of the handler to control the dog.
I would define hot as the inability of a dog to temper its desire to do whatever it wants through its inherent willingness to cooperate and its trained obedience to its handler?s commands.
Good field trial dogs and good hunting dogs are bred with desire and a cooperative attitude in mind.
I do not believe that lines which consistently produce dogs that are too hot will be successful in field trials over the long run. A dog that demonstrates both desire and cooperation with its handler will be appreciated by a knowledgeable judge. In addition, since trainers spend so much time working with their field trial prospects, they appreciate a cooperative, highly trainable dog. It makes their job much easier.

1. Field Testing
AKC events provide owners an opportunity to evaluate their dog?s ability in the field. Most owners have been working with their dogs and they want an objective method to gauge their progress. The graduated testing levels in the hunting test program challenges their dog to become a better hunting companion.
2. Benefit For The Dog
Their dog enjoys the field activities and they want to provide their dog an opportunity to do what it was bred to do. The events help keep their dog in good physical and mental condition.
3. Healthy Activity
The owners enjoy being outdoors and participating in the healthy activities associated with these organized events. They enjoy watching dogs perform in the tests.
4. Camaraderie

The owners enjoy meeting and associating with people that share their interests. The clubs and events provide a social connection and a resource for learning.
The trainers and breeders that work with dogs and study their behavior on a long-term basis have learned a great deal about what makes a great dog. I think the hunter looking for a great hunting companion should take advantage of the knowledge that these dedicated dog people possess.

Regarding retrievers taking a line for extreme distances but not being able to mark a 30-yard fall, in both the field trial and hunting test programs, a dog?s blind retrieving skills and ability to mark are tested approximately evenly. The standards for both event types specifically state ?the ability to mark accurately is of primary importance.? A dog that could not complete a 30-yard mark would not be able to pass even the beginning level of the hunting test program.


GD: One of this magazines regular contributors recently stated that unless you have specific plans to breed or sell your dog, there was no compelling reason to register the dog with the AKC. What is your response?
DL: I attend many sporting dog activities and have met thousands of participants. There are many good reasons why they register their dogs with the AKC.
5. Acting For The Greater Good Many owners have a desire to be associated with an organization that is interested in acting on behalf of their breed, their sport and dogs in general. The AKC does this in many ways, including providing support to local groups seeking responsible canine legislation, support for canine health research, hiring a team of field inspectors to identify unhealthy and indiscriminate breeding facilities, and providing assistance to all pet owners and their animals during a time of natural disasters.


GD: Many sporting breeds are badly split between show and field lines to the point that the two different types do not look like they are the same breed. What is the AKC doing to discourage this divergence? Are there any plans for programs that will encourage the proponents of ?field? and ?show? lines to start talking to each other and perhaps begin to recognize the importance to the breeds as a whole of correct conformation in the field dogs and field ability in the show dogs?

DL: The split between show and performance lines is an issue facing every performance breed. This has occurred through the collective action of the breed?s supporters. In a system that allows a breeder to decide how to breed, many breeders tend to breed for their own interest, which may be narrowly focused. There have been suggestions from a few that the breeding of performance breeds should be directed by teams of breed experts. Most breed supporters would strongly reject this idea and as a practical matter, I don?t think it would work in the United States.
Under the AKC system, each breed has a parent club. It is the responsibility of the parent club to act in the best interest of the breed. Several parent clubs hold special classes at their National Specialty Show to showcase and acknowledge the accomplishments of their dual dogs. Other parent clubs hold performance events in conjun
ction with their National Specialty Show.
AKC encourages this to the extent it is possible given the location and availability of facilities. AKC awards titles that identify what the dog has accomplished. It awards a special title?the Dual Champion?to dogs that achieve both their Field Championship and Conformation Championship. These dogs should be held in the highest regard.

Today more than ever it is important for the supporters of a breed (or a sport) to act for the greater good. This means acknowledging and cooperating with individuals within our own clubs that have similar interest in the breed but pursue that interest in a different venue. I feel this same spirit of cooperation should extend to organizations outside the AKC that choose to pursue the same general purpose in a slightly different manner.

Anytime a breed or sport splits, whether internal to a club or externally through other organizations, it hurts our common interests and lessens the chances of achieving our purpose?the betterment of our breed or the improvement of our sport.


GD: In the February/March 2007 issue, behavior columnist Ed Bailey made the following assertions:
The cooperative temperament is often overlooked in breeding because it wont win field trials or attain the top qualifying placements in various hunt tests.We select winners of trials and tests for breeding stock under the assumption that if the dog has won or earned a title in an ersatz hunting configuration no matter how farfetched from the reality of hunting wild game that test or trial might be then it will be a useful hunting dog.
Do todays trials and tests really have much to do with selectively breeding good hunting dogs Nowadays, mostly, they select for good field trial or test dogs and these may differ markedly from the type of dog wanted by the average hunter. Your response?

DL: I would define temperament as the attitude the dog brings to work. It is his mindset, and as such, is a very basic factor influencing his behavior. A dog?s temperament is reflected in things such as his willingness to cooperate and his desire to work. Proper temperament should be a major consideration in one?s breeding program.

The behavior that a cooperative temperament elicits can be modified to a degree by the relationship between the trainer and the dog. The trainer must maintain a degree of discipline, and it should be applied consistently and fairly in order to promote obedient behavior from his dog. The influence of a cooperative temperament and obedience blend together and are reflected in a dog?s performance.
Field trialing and hunting are team sports and a cooperative dog is much appreciated in both applications.
An experienced trainer can bend a dog to his will. This amounts to the trainer imposing a high degree of obedience on a dog in order to overcome an uncooperative temperament. The knowledgeable eye will appreciate the difference between truly cooperative behavior and forced behavior. The hunt that is not truly cooperative will lack the desired flow, the sense of teamwork, and the quiet assurance that things are under control.

Observing a dog hunting is a great pleasure to hunters and field trialers alike. It is satisfying when a dog appears at the right place at the right time. You smile to yourself and think, How did he do that? This is reflective of a cooperative relationship between dog and handler.
I feel strongly that cooperative behavior is important for both the hunter and the field trailer; that it is valued by a knowledgeable judge and it is a major factor in achieving an outstanding performance in field trials or hunting tests.

GD: More and more professional trainers are telling clients that if they want to be successful in hunt tests or field trials, they cannot actually hunt with their trial/test dogs, that hunting will mess the dog up for trials or tests.
Is this just pro trainers? wanting to keep the dogs in trial/test training year round in order to improve their bottom lines or have these events strayed so far from the reality of hunting that what the trainers are saying is true?


DL: Hunting test and field trial performances at the upper levels are held to a high standard. Depending on the test level or the degree of competition, a dog?s performance may almost require perfection. If a hunter is willing to correct the dog when it makes a mistake while hunting, then hunting is the ultimate way to train a dog for trials and tests. However, in the excitement of the hunt, most hunters are more interested in shooting at the bird than they are their dog?s performance.
It is not the act of hunting that messes up the dog, but rather the inconsistency in the handling of the dog. It can create habits in the dog that the professional trainer has to correct when he gets the dog back. I can understand from the trainer?s point of view, this may be something he would prefer not to do.

Hunting builds desire, particularly in younger dogs. It teaches a dog to hunt smart through its experience in finding birds; it can improve a dogs style, and it can enliven the spirit of an older, experienced dog. All trial/test dogs should be hunted if at all possible. It only makes them better in the long run.


And...


Pro Trainers Confirm the Failures with Trialing and Trial dogs
Too Hot, Too Wired, Performance Flaws, Conformation Flaws et al

February/March 2007 issue, behavior columnist Ed Bailey made the following assertions:
The cooperative temperament is often overlooked in breeding because it wont win field trials or attain the top qualifying placements in various hunt tests.
We select winners of trials and tests for breeding stock under the assumption that if the dog has won or earned a title in an ersatz hunting configuration no matter how far fetched from the reality of hunting wild game that test or trial might be then it will be a useful hunting dog.
Do todays trials and tests really have much to do with selectively breeding good hunting dogs?
Nowadays, mostly, they select for good field trial or test dogs and these may differ markedly from the type of dog wanted by the average hunter.'
http://www.gundogmag.com/2010/09/23/gd_amerkennel_200807/
 
Last edited:
To those that think the Lab out performs a Springer in the uplands, or as a Phez dog specifically, give me some of what youre smoking..

Good ones will put game in the bag, but there are better tools.
You know it, I know it..

Were it so, The English wouldnt bother with Springers/Cockers on rough hunting-beating brush as we call it.

Corrib-Gun-Dogs-English-Springer-Spaniel-Labrador-Irish-Red-Setter-Pups-Gun-Dogs-Bitches-Clare-Munster-Ireland-004.jpg


k6673d1.jpg


Springers,_Labradors,_and_a_Cocker_Spaniel_-_geograph.org.uk_-_640736.jpg





Guys,
Labs have alot of fine qualities and are admired for many great things.
But you wont find sled doggers beating down the doors to Lab breeders to enhance stamina in their sled racing teams, as they ARE doing with Versatile dogs like Pointers and GSPs.
Sled_Dogs_0046.jpg
 
Last edited:
Were it so, The English wouldnt bother with Springers/Cockers on rough hunting-beating brush as we call it.

The fact of the matter is that a real upland Lab would kill a bunch of those Brits' newly liberated pen-raised birds before they ever got off the ground. Then the chaps in the argyle socks, knickers and snap-brim hats who paid a bunch of money for a driven shoot would have little to shoot at before retiring to a spot of tea.

That would be a dreadful situation, would it not? Therefore, they don't let it occur.
 
The fact of the matter is that a real upland Lab would kill a bunch of those Brits' newly liberated pen-raised birds before they ever got off the ground. Then the chaps in the argyle socks, knickers and snap-brim hats who paid a bunch of money for a driven shoot would have little to shoot at before retiring to a spot of tea.

That would be a dreadful situation, would it not? Therefore, they don't let it occur.

Nothing to do with anything. A rough hunt is not a 'shoot' thats why I differentiated.
And trutly, their shoots arent much different than many states 'put N take' affairs.

On a hunt, English shoot alot of WILD snipe, hare as well as quail and phez. And their phez are no less wild than most of ours. Even the Dakotas stock pen reared birds.

The English place high value on retrieving as well as manners from dogs, theirs are under great control and extremely well trained, in fact when the best dog teams in the world went there to test, the USA placed 5th and these were our best dogs in the country, Cripples are paramount to them (Wiping the eye).


And of course, youre forgetting the real prized trophy, red grouse on the wide open highland moors, similar to our great praries except with hills and fog.
Those really require a pointing dog to cover ground and that is what is widely used. And Im not seeing wide brimmed hat, argygles or knickers on rough hunts. Please, lets not come off as spiteful or ignorant, the English have fine proven tradition and have brought the world great dogs, from terriers to pointers and of course, the retrievers.

BenAlderandLochErichS.jpg


TapoNoth011GollumwhenS.jpg


PtarmiganBenRinnes092.jpg



John-Fields.jpg



Gamekeepers+Prepare+Launch+Red+Grouse+Shooting+1zGSodi9gsfl.jpg


A-grouse-keeper-at-Horseu-001.jpg
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top