Crops or Conservation

UGUIDE

Active member
Got therse articels out of Agweek this morning and thought it was a well written article that really solidifies the issues and gets away from farmer bashing and puts the financial burdens squarley on those that own them. Take a read and let me know if I can fill in blanks as I had a hard time getting big articel on one page and some of text is cut off.

See attachements (2)

Related tiling article

http://www.agweek.com/event/article/id/19430/group/Agribusiness/
 
Last edited:
Got it to enlarge the second time. Good read, I can see the farmers point of view. Like it or not, the farmer is farming to make money to pay the bills. I can also see the dilemma this would cause for the farmers. Thank you for sharing this with us.:thumbsup:
 
History repeats it's self! Getting all you can get is what is all about, We all do it. PF Mcloud chapter isre a 4 million dollar chapter and will sell another 80 acres to the state this summer for hunting.
Last year we gave away corn feeders and over $15000.00 worth of corn to fill them. The pheasants were still down this year. Now were are giving away new and improved feeders and corn only PF members. I am not pointing the finger but we here need to come up with some ideas to save the birds. We cannot depend on Joe farmer or give him all the blame.
I know a guy who bought 20 acres and he groomed it birds and gets 15 to 20 birds a year off of it. There is always land forsale. People can get together to buy some or join their PF chapter and help them. It's always fun to sit and talk about it but we need to take action.
 
History repeats it's self! Getting all you can get is what is all about, We all do it. PF Mcloud chapter isre a 4 million dollar chapter and will sell another 80 acres to the state this summer for hunting.
Last year we gave away corn feeders and over $15000.00 worth of corn to fill them. The pheasants were still down this year. Now were are giving away new and improved feeders and corn only PF members. I am not pointing the finger but we here need to come up with some ideas to save the birds. We cannot depend on Joe farmer or give him all the blame.
I know a guy who bought 20 acres and he groomed it birds and gets 15 to 20 birds a year off of it. There is always land forsale. People can get together to buy some or join their PF chapter and help them. It's always fun to sit and talk about it but we need to take action.

Now you are talking. Rather than waiting for congress to spend tax dollar on CRP get a group together and create a little of your own and have some fun doing it. It could be rented for 10 years instead of purchased.
 
History does repeat itself. Looking at corn/bean/wheat farming, the obvious cycles are there.
The logic fails me why it is so difficult to learn from past mistakes.
1930's Dust bowl years
1956 Soil Bank
1985 CRP program initiated.

From Wikipedea's history of CRP (bold highlights added by me)

The program originally began in the 1950s as the conservation branch of the Soil Bank Program which was enacted by the Agriculture Act of 1954 [3]. The theory behind this branch of the Soil Bank Program was to focus on lands that were at high risk of erosion, remove them from agricultural production, and establish native or alternative permanent vegetative cover in an effort to counteract actual or potential erosion. This was considered by proponents to be beneficial to sustainable agriculture generally, by lessening the effects of erosion. Originally, the program called for three-year contracts in which the government would pay for land improvements that increased soil, water, forestry, or wildlife quality if the farmer would agree not to harvest or graze contracted land [4].

Although the roots of the program were established in the 1950s, advocates did not start pushing the program heavily until the 1980s, in response to more prevalent practices of the 1970s, whereby farmers increasingly began to cultivate “fence row to fence row”, and remove native habitat and vegetative stands from the fields, which was perceived as having detrimental effects on soil, water, and habitat quality [2]. Many programs would be established in the 1980s to address these issues.

The CRP has gone through many changes. Whenever there is a new proposed Farm Bill, the CRP is a large focus due to a high level of public pressure and the program's perceived benefits.

end of quote.

If a field is worked to hard, erosion will occur. Just as it has in the past. I do not fault anyone for trying to make additional money, but if buffer strips are removed, erosion will occur. It is not a maybe.

To those who enjoy pheasant hunting, the buffer strips are great. But the primary reason for the strips is to avoid a dust bowl type scenario.
 
no till farming

little off topic but indirect to erosion and the founding principles of CRP...

i am crunching numbers on no-till farming, specifically our family farm which is currently being rented to neighbors who are conventional tillage farming (rip, disc, etc). prior to my dad getting out of farming 10 yrs ago, he was no-till and like most of the farmers 10-15 yrs ago they bought into the hype but appeared to fizzle as they didn't see the yield increases quickly. it's a process, and the soil needs 3-4 yrs of no till with proper rotation to see the increased yields, erosion benefits, organic matter benefits, etc....


i'm trying to find the data that shows the % of conventional tillage farms vs no till----in addition to CRP and the conservation movement (or lack thereof) -- I see no-till significantly improving habitat. even with the more advanced spraying requirements.
 
Back
Top