This whole thing is my fault for three reasons.
First, I shouldn't have talked about a plant without an accurate description of it. It's just that it was uncanny how the birds came to it for cover late in the day and ignored other areas.
Second, I should have realized that this site is read by a lot of people who may have difficulty with different concepts and techniques. Some people who have never hunted w/o a dog still think that they are the hunter instead of just the shooter with their dog being the hunter.
Lastly, you don't have to have manners to post on these sites. It is common to, in effect, call other people liars and themselves god like in their skills because nobody knows differently. Being closed minded to new concepts is all too common. I can't imagine what Spence would say if I described how I take a duck decoy, put a battery powered motor inside it that makes flat pieces of plastic spin where it's wing should be, stick a pole up it's behind and put it in a the pond to shoot ducks.
The use of pheasant calls have two components. Do they sound real and if so, so what? Yes, you can make every sound exactly the way that a rooster can make it. It major use is while hunting w/o a dog you call and every guy within earshot heads toward you following his dog and you shoot birds their dogs run to you. Strangely satisfying. There is another use that is best left a mystery.
As far as Spence's comments about released birds on California's wildlife areas, some birds are released on Class C areas for junior and lady hunters to shoot but the Class A areas, where those birds were shot, are the offspring of wild birds from Oregon planted in the 1880s.
http://books.google.com/books?id=0R...when were pheasants planted in calif.&f=false
Kansas seems to have planted their seed stock later in or around the 1920s:
http://books.google.com/books?id=Zu...when were pheasants planted in Kansas&f=false
I look forward to receiving a pm from Spence with his CV and unlike his response to my experiences, I will believe him.