Results

Jim the reason cutting and burning are suggested and sometimes required is because it is "wildlife management"
So many are into bird watching, photography, hiking etc,
For most now days a hovering hawk is more of a visual trophy then a brood of pheasants or Mallards or any game species in general.

OK, that is OK.

There is very little "game management" going on anymore.

Just saying, turning a grassland into stubble in July-August just at the time food requirements are at the peak for many predatory species, mainly the avian ones. Fledgling hawks/owls at this time are most vulnerable to starvation.
Grassland into stubble FAR MORE will be of benefit the predators then the prey.

Again I say "whatever people want" It is what it is.
 
Jim, any fire regime is "Ecosystem Management" it is based on the plants, not the game or non-game. Yes, there are game and non-game species that benefit from the fire just as cattle and the predecessors, bison, benefitted from the fire. Further, historic fires didn't just happen in certain months. They happened year round and each resulted in different plant and animal responses. The problem today is that so much of our "prairie" type ecosystems are either converted to cropland or they are in some disarray from mismanagement. The grazing that these ecosystems developed under also were different historically. Under bison, great herds migrated across the landscape eating and trampling the above ground plant parts until they were more of a lawn height then the herd moved on and those acres may have never seen a grazer again that year. Now, with the annual stocking of the same rate for the same months, the grasslands are typically overgrazed and the more palatable taller species are in decline as they are grazed and re-grazed before they have had time for their roots to recover. The fact that today's recipe grazing standards fail on many levels to function in the same manner as historic burns often makes fire on the landscape even more beneficial. A burn in the mosaic of heights left by "normal" stocking and grazing today will even out the forage and move cattle off of the overgrazed plants and redistribute them across the pasture where they will now graze the formerly ungrazed plants because they don't have to eat the thatch at the same time as the new growth.

If the primary goal is "game" or "wildlife" management, steps might be taken to restrict the size of the burn or protect cover within the burn so that escape cover is still available. The Horseshoe plantation in southern Georgia leaves nesting motts so that the birds can still reproduce in the burned cover in these unburned motts and then move directly into the brood-rearing cover upon hatching. When you're dealing with patches of limited acreage, as long as there is adequate cover in the surrounding space, the fire will only temporarily displace the wildlife that were using it. Once the cover regrows, the wildlife will again use it. Again, using a summer or fall burn is only recommended when conditions within the habitat require it or some other management goal requires it. My patch burn/patch graze methods (google OSU patch burn/patch graze) are structured to create diversity in otherwise limited diversity cover with a significant goal of providing varied habitat ages in a single pasture and providing higher protein forage for stock when it normally wouldn't be available. This is designed to provide that higher protein when it will add growth to stockers when it would normally be waning. Read the Oklahoma State literature and you'll learn quite a bit more than can be transmitted in this space.
 
I moderated the "Cattle Today" forums for about 8 years.
We talked long and hard about putting on pounds of beef.
And I am a cattle producer, raised thousands of head over the years.
This is "Ultimate Pheasant Hunting" forums.
We should talk "Ultimate Pheasant Habitat"
By no stretch of the imagination did Ring Neck Pheasants evolve with the Bison herds and the American Prairies.
 
My pastures are very productive in terms of pheasant and duck production. How I manage them has a lot to do with that productivity. Cattle and birds have a strong symbiotic relationship. You really can't talk about pheasants without the positive impact that cattle can have on them.
 
We should talk "Ultimate Pheasant Habitat"
By no stretch of the imagination did Ring Neck Pheasants evolve with the Bison herds and the American Prairies.

This is the "habitat" section of the site. That is precisely what's being discussed:).

Thus far it's been interesting and informative:cheers:
 
Back
Top