Range-Pointing Dog

Shadow;84010 like I say- would really enjoy being in a field with 2 of mine and 2 FC dogs- BUT- no shock collars to keep them in- you game[/QUOTE said:
You don't have to list the dog, according to the remek site the guy you mentioned has owned 2 FC AA brits. But, you don't seem to understand how e-collars work. Besides, in my last arguement with you, you told me how big your brits run and how mine will have to back at 200 yards, now your telling me that if I don't use an ecollar my dog will run too big. I guess Im not understanding, and Im not trying to start another aruement. But, I have only had to use the e-collar to keep my dog "in" once or twice, and both times were in the prairies of SD hunting late season roosters in thin cover. She was on birds and those birds weren't going to stop running unles I shot them on the ground, no matter how hard she tried to pin them. She hunts accordingly to the terrain, and wether Im on foot or off a horse. She's been ran off foot and off horse enough to know the difference, and she is two totally different dogs either way. When people tell me you can't hunt over a Field Champion, my first question is what kind of FC? Are you saying you can't hunt over a Gun Dog FC? How about a Shooting Dog FC, or an All Age FC... You can easily foot hunt over a Field Champion, I do it all the time. Heck, the original purpose of "Gun Dog" trials, was to compare dogs who stayed within "Gun range". IF you can't foot hunt over a dog that stays within 100 yards, who can you foot hunt over?
 
Last edited:
I understand- first- don't believe all the crap you think about folks in the 70's who had to beat their dogs to hunt, range, pay attention, handle, back, and retrieve- you weren't there- you didn't hunt with 5 guys who had 13 pointing dogs who ran them all together- it's easy now- strap on the shock collar- any dog will soon learn to obey

take your Garmin and your shock collar off- I'll not put the Garmin on my male- you want to come here and enjoy a day- you and Ace me and Shadow-

i know for a fact that they use to pop them in the butt for not staying steady.
had to many old timer tell me that. they would also beat them for any off game. collar is a better solution hands down for training an animal of behavior problems. my last post on this subject..:thumbsup:
 
i know for a fact that they use to pop them in the butt for not staying steady.
had to many old timer tell me that. they would also beat them for any off game. collar is a better solution hands down for training an animal of behavior problems. my last post on this subject..:thumbsup:

I know an old timer who is in his mid 70's who ran, and still runs the occasional trial. Before him, his dad was a field trial trainer who ran pointers. His dad would breed a litter of pups and run them until they were 1 year old back in the 50's and 60's. If none of the dogs were cut out to be trial dogs, his dad would throw them off a bridge into a river, as they floated down on the other side the son's job was to shoot the dogs in the river as they went by. The stories he told were nothing short of horrific, shooting them in the butt was tame compared to some of the stuff. Horrible, but true. Ive seen the son demonstrate a "whoa" post. While I respect him and think he knows a lot about training, I only had to see that once. On the other hand, Ive also seen someone train "whoa" with an e-collar after the dog learned off a check cord. The e-collar was much, much more human, and it worked a heck of a lot quicker..
 
I understand- first- don't believe all the crap you think about folks in the 70's who had to beat their dogs to hunt, range, pay attention, handle, back, and retrieve- you weren't there- you didn't hunt with 5 guys who had 13 pointing dogs who ran them all together- it's easy now- strap on the shock collar- any dog will soon learn to obey

take your Garmin and your shock collar off- I'll not put the Garmin on my male- you want to come here and enjoy a day- you and Ace me and Shadow-

or- you and VJohn- we each run one dog with no Garmin, no shock collars- on PC's in the area you choose- the one with the best dog has to buy supper- the one with the poorest dog has to clean the birds and brush the dogs

Now Shadow, you can't tell me that you are an oldtimer and have been around birddogs for years, and never saw someone pound on a dog, or shot them with bird shot. I am not say you did it, I am say that if you have been at this that long, you know someone that has.

I value my dog as much and I suspect more than most. I would never do anything that is not in the best interest of my dog.

And hunting without a Garnin and e-collar on is not in his best interest or safety, So it isn't going to Fringin happen. I do run my dog in a trial every now and them, the e-collar comes off then, but the Garmin is on him and the Judge has the handheld in his saddle bag.
 
Shadow, I guess you have your beliefs and I respect that. I don't agree with you and don't understand why you wouldn't hunt with someone just because their dog has an e-collar on. I agree a dog should be trained so they are obedient in the field and wouldn't need an e-collar. But no dog is perfect and if the dog is properly trained with an e-collar it can be a great tool for training the dog in the field or re-enforcing your training.

When I run NSTRA trials you cannot use e-collars. My dog is steady on point, backs like a champ and obeys my whistle commands always. Same in the field. So do I need an e-collar, heck no. But I do have one on my dog a lot of the times for the reasons I stated in my previous post. I'd hate to think anyone would not hunt with my dog just because she is wearing an e-collar. It has nothing to do with the level of training, it's simply owner preference.

I know all about NSTRA trials
it's not that I won't hunt with dogs that need shock collars on-
it's- why do you need a shock collar on your dog and how is that dog in a field on a days hunt when it doesn't have the shock collar on- simply put-
take the shock collar off and let the dog run- it's a good dog right- show it doesn't need the collar on- my point- be willing to unstrap that shock collar- you aren't willing- your dog is suspect
 
Now Shadow, you can't tell me that you are an oldtimer and have been around birddogs for years, and never saw someone pound on a dog, or shot them with bird shot. I am not say you did it, I am say that if you have been at this that long, you know someone that has.

I value my dog as much and I suspect more than most. I would never do anything that is not in the best interest of my dog.

And hunting without a Garnin and e-collar on is not in his best interest or safety, So it isn't going to Fringin happen. I do run my dog in a trial every now and them, the e-collar comes off then, but the Garmin is on him and the Judge has the handheld in his saddle bag.

you mistake me- yes- I was fresh out of college and came down here to hunt with my uncle and his freinds- I can name names- 1972- in 2 years I never saw anyone shoot at a dog- pick them up and shake them- yes-
you should have hunted with real bird dog guys from those days- you would have a different outlook on bird hunting

what's the matter- you have a real good dog- you don't think you can handle yours without a shock collar and Garmin-
I've already stated- my Britt will hunt for me and I don't need a shock collar or a Garmin to have a good day in the field-
you can't- you have a superb dog- why not put it with another without the electronics- no faith
 
Last edited:
show it doesn't need the collar on- my point- be willing to unstrap that shock collar- you aren't willing- your dog is suspect

If he runs trials without a collar, Im pretty sure it means his dog isn't suspect, and doesn't need a collar....

Running a Garmin has nothing to do with the level of training... Or does it? IMO, a well trained dog is much more likely to need a Garmin then an untrained dog.. Why? Because a well trained dog is going to be 99.9% staunch on birds, and not move if the birds hold. If that means the dog is going to stand for 20 minutes, so be it. Few dogs have that kind of patience. How are you going to find a dog that will hold a bird for that long in heavy cover? Want an example? Here ya go. The dog was standing for almost 10 minutes by the time we go to it. When we did find where the dog was supposed to be, we thought the collar had come off because we couldn't see the dog, and all the GPS said was "near".. In other words the dog was withing about 5 yards of us. Without a GPS, we would have NEVER found my dog. So, can you find Waldo Shadow?

attachment.php
 
Last edited:
I am old enough to have hunted with people of that era, and did.
Many were good birddog people and some I wanted to beat the crap out of for mistreating their dogs. But they were their dogs so I kept my mouth shut. It was considered bad manors to interfere between them and their dog, just as it is bad manors to badmouth someones dog.

Some of the good old days was not so good. You know that and I do too.

Training without an e-collar is not magic. The best dog trainers that I have been around teach the dog the command without the e-collar first. Once the dog knows the command and is demonstrating that they know it, the e-collar can then be use. IF you don't want to use the e-collar don't, but the training is the basically the same.
 
i know for a fact that they use to pop them in the butt for not staying steady.
had to many old timer tell me that. they would also beat them for any off game. collar is a better solution hands down for training an animal of behavior problems. my last post on this subject..:thumbsup:

I hunted for 2 years with 4 guys and every field was let em loose- talking about up to 13 dogs- never ever saw anyone pop them in the butt- thing you're full of it- or saw idiot nut heads with so called bird dogs

can tell you- the group I ran with would have "popped you in the butt" if you swung your gun on a dog and pulled the trigger- we'd have loaded up your dog and made you walk home at the very least

think you are living in La La land
 
If he runs trials without a collar, Im pretty sure it means his dog isn't suspect, and doesn't need a collar....

so- why did he say no way-
all a dog has to do is stay in reasonable contact- handle- back at first sight of the other dog on point-
 
I hunted for 2 years with 4 guys and every field was let em loose- talking about up to 13 dogs- never ever saw anyone pop them in the butt- thing you're full of it- or saw idiot nut heads with so called bird dogs

can tell you- the group I ran with would have "popped you in the butt" if you swung your gun on a dog and pulled the trigger- we'd have loaded up your dog and made you walk home at the very least

think you are living in La La land

i was trying to stay out of this but you are just one insult after another..
you show a lack of class with your childish insults and blabber.
yes i know these folks in kentucky and yes they did pop the dogs.. it was the way they trained. reading your post you have not a clue on how to train or handle a dog. put the bottle down and come back when your sober..:rolleyes:
 
If he runs trials without a collar, Im pretty sure it means his dog isn't suspect, and doesn't need a collar....

so- why did he say no way-
all a dog has to do is stay in reasonable contact- handle- back at first sight of the other dog on point-

like dad always said: never argue with a fool, they will drag you down to there level and beat you with experiance... so i will argue with you no more..:cheers:
 
Shadow.. Here's what you have to understand. Just because YOU don't hunt with an e-collar, doesn't mean someone else dog is suspect because they do. I guarantee you that if you put your unbroke dog in a trial, everyone would look at you and wonder why you wasted their time with an untrained dog that didn't have any maners around birds. And none of those dogs you ran against would be wearing e-collars....... Your dog does a good job for you, and thats all that matters. I guarantee you that your dogs wouldn't do a good job for me, because like you said in an earlier post, they aren't even broke. I don't put my dog down with unbroke dogs, but i won't judge you because you do. IMO, a dog aint worth a damn if its not broke. But my opinion doesn't matter to you, because you don't demand perfection, nor do you need it in a hunting dog.
 
I am old enough to have hunted with people of that era, and did.
Many were good birddog people and some I wanted to beat the crap out of for mistreating their dogs. But they were their dogs so I kept my mouth shut. It was considered bad manors to interfere between them and their dog, just as it is bad manors to badmouth someones dog.

Some of the good old days was not so good. You know that and I do too.

Training without an e-collar is not magic. The best dog trainers that I have been around teach the dog the command without the e-collar first. Once the dog knows the command and is demonstrating that they know it, the e-collar can then be use. IF you don't want to use the e-collar don't, but the training is the basically the same.

interesting- you would be 60 years old- right
you would now Junior Dixon, Floyd Hodges, Errni Simmons, Dave Trombley

you need to sit back- and think- some would come to your house knowing you had a bird dog that you beat-

we didn't beat bird dogs in those days- we used ours to dove, duck, quail, and pheasant hunt

we had as good of pointing dogs as there are today
we ran in some AKC field trials

we ran EP, ES, Britt's- all had to back- or be put in the dog boxes- standard proceedure- you din't put a dog on the ground unless it had manners
we didn't have shock collars

in honor of my uncles- I hunt bird dogs as they did- old school
 
i was trying to stay out of this but you are just one insult after another..
you show a lack of class with your childish insults and blabber.
yes i know these folks in kentucky and yes they did pop the dogs.. it was the way they trained. reading your post you have not a clue on how to train or handle a dog. put the bottle down and come back when your sober..:rolleyes:

you mistake me- but then you might not have any class

this is all about-
RANGING

you need a shock collar on your dog- your dog covers grond- your dog handles- why do you need a shock collar if your dog handles-

I DON'T
 
you mistake me- but then you might not have any class

this is all about-
RANGING

you need a shock collar on your dog- your dog covers grond- your dog handles- why do you need a shock collar if your dog handles-

I DON'T

Simple.. What if it takes a step after a bird falls? What if it accidentally busts a bird and doesn't stop to flush? You stated in an earlier post that you would NEVER let your dog track a running bird.. How do you pull your dog off if it decides to ignore you and track a running bird? And please don't tell us your dogs have never disobeyed you in the field. Most likely, you don't demand your dogs to perform to the same level as many of us. Thats Ok, but don't bash people because they do demand close to perfection.
 
Shadow.. Here's what you have to understand. Just because YOU don't hunt with an e-collar, doesn't mean someone else dog is suspect because they do. I guarantee you that if you put your unbroke dog in a trial, everyone would look at you and wonder why you wasted their time with an untrained dog that didn't have any maners around birds. And none of those dogs you ran against would be wearing e-collars....... Your dog does a good job for you, and thats all that matters. I guarantee you that your dogs wouldn't do a good job for me, because like you said in an earlier post, they aren't even broke. I don't put my dog down with unbroke dogs, but i won't judge you because you do. IMO, a dog aint worth a damn if its not broke. But my opinion doesn't matter to you, because you don't demand perfection, nor do you need it in a hunting dog.

depends on the trial- wouldn't you say- if I was to run in NSTRA and place 1st- you would say a waste- no good dog-
you would run your FC in a NSTRA trial- but it might run right out of bounds and on- a waste

think it all boils down to- a dog that can really run, and turn to hunt for the gunner- not keep right on running- you and others with real big running dogs can turn yours when you want- without a shock collar- that's impressive-
I've had my hands full keeping Britt's inside 1/4 mile for the past 20 years-

suppose I should have bought the best shock collar 20 years ago and it would have been easy-
but I like to think mine turn because they are out far enough and want to be where I am because we are a team so they turn and swing in- VS- hit them with a shock to turn and come in

hum- I'd rather have a 1/4 mile dog that swings on it's own rather than shock the dog so it comes back

I may be missing something- like I've said- who is real experienced in this stuff who can show me after 3 hours in a field behind my Britt's why I should buy a shock collar
 
Simple.. What if it takes a step after a bird falls? What if it accidentally busts a bird and doesn't stop to flush? You stated in an earlier post that you would NEVER let your dog track a running bird.. How do you pull your dog off if it decides to ignore you and track a running bird? And please don't tell us your dogs have never disobeyed you in the field. Most likely, you don't demand your dogs to perform to the same level as many of us. Thats Ok, but don't bash people because they do demand close to perfection.

I have never allowed my Britt's to put their nose to the gound to track- I pull them off- I've seen a pointer track and point 10 times on a wounded roosters

So I don't have all of mine steady to wing and shot- is that so bad- to perfectionists- probably

disobeyed!!- of course mine have- they aren't robots- I should have a shock collar on them so I can shock them when they aren't perfect
you have kids- correct
 
Shadow the point I and many others have been trying to make is that wearing an e-collar or not wearing an e-collar has little to do with a birddog being good or bad, or the owner or trainer being a dog man or not.

I hunted with several older men in my early teens, They were nice enough to take me because my dad was not a hunter. Dad just didn't have time.

But I saw them on several occasions "pepper" a dogs but for making a mistake or not following commands. They did it as a correction when they could not get to the dog, I didn't like it, but that is the way many old timers did it. That is just a fact. If you family and friends didn't do that, they are to be congratulated. But the fact remains that many old timers did it before the days of e-collar.

If you do the math, if you start hunting when you are 12-13 in 1972 you would be in your early 50's now. As I am.

This topic has run its course for me, on to something of interest about hunting and bird dogs.:cheers:
 
Back
Top