Fair question. I hesitate to answer as I do not want the thread to turn to 'here are some dogs that do all that', but here goes: It goes back to what I value more in a dog for my situation and me wanting to follow my own experiences vs 'the talk of the training and hunting clubs' (despite that being well qualified opinion). I have no interest in field trials or titles for my next dog. I don't care how broad their chest is, blocky head, or other looks. My hunts are not timed. I want meat in the freezer and to have an enjoyable pursuit of said flying meat. Hunt wild birds exclusively and not just when the weather is nice. Also need a dog that thrives at being a well behaved family house dog and fishing partner the other 8 months of the year. Close, methodical hunter, easily trained, love of birds, physically robust, etc., but with a rock solid off switch.
I'm sure there are thousands of other dogs out there that have done this wonderfully, but I have first-hand experience with a dog that nailed all of what I wanted and that is what I want to match as closely as I can (genetically) this time around. The only other dog I have experienced with this balance was his half-brother (same sire, shown above). Again, this is within the bounds of the few dozen dogs I have spent time with and what I personally value in a dog. There are others with similar testimony online regarding this dog and his offspring, but of course everyone loves their dog.
At the end of the day, there could have been zero titles on this stud or any in his line. There were certainly no titles on the dam. My personal experience with his offspring vs dozens of others makes me want more. Not trying to sell the virtues of this dog to anyone else - Personal choice. Having said all that I would consider Raider lines a main/big name in the pointing lab world. Cashman's is still selling frozen of Trooper many years later so they seem to think his genetics are worth continuing.
I have another dog with several of the big names on your list among others. That was my approach last time: Find the pedigree with the highest weighting of all the titles and big names. See my earlier comments above about unguided missile, etc. It did not turn out well in terms of what I was looking for. Incredibly athletic dog and I'm sure he could have had all the titles by his name with a good trainer putting in lots of hours of drilling, but that is not what I am looking for. And I hunt with a lot of different people, also with big name breeders, trainers, and pedigrees and get to see how they perform in the field and at home for comparison.
But this is not to argue the virtues of or disparage any dog, line, or breeder vs another. My point of starting the thread was how anyone might go about putting in a dog or dogs and finding how strongly a litter matches (for whatever motivation they may have). In my case it is not for the pursuit of titling ability, but closeness genetically (and hopefully in turn performance and behaviorally) to a few key dogs (one in particular). Surely I am not the only one on here that thinks to himself 'dang, wish I had another one like that...'
Thanks everyone for the good input and discussion.