I hate the weather too.
You seem pretty mild as a trainer and I like that (we both know a lot of lab guys that aren't I would bet). I would agree that a collar is often misused by people that don't train - I keep it on my dog for skunks, coyotes, traffic, and those rare instances she needs to stop what she is doing now - pursuit of skunks and hogs seem to override voice commands. I would agree on the health certs (main reason I sought out a FT pup). I would also agree on the "cashing in" thing too. Most of the those bashing on the show ring and FTing are truly concerned about the future of the breed.
No one is more critical of show ring chessies (that aren't hunters) than a chessie owner that hunts or tests so this isn't a lab bashing session.
I have to agree with you, If you understand the collar it is not a punishment tool, and for somebody that doesnt use it alot that is the way it is used,
Distance errodes control, so this is were the e-collar is a great tool, when the dog gets 200 yards out it has a tendency to not take a command as well, timing with the collar is crucial, if you have it in your pocket it is to late, and it doesnt need to be on a high level to get there attention,
Gatzby, I was taking to a elder gentlemen in his 70s the other day he was a field trialer, he trained with Lean Mac quite often, he said he was not a good training dog during the week, but when he was in the spotlight he shined!!
His weakest points were his waterblinds, but those dogs back then most likely had alot of voice and other pressure then the collar, which took alot more time to train them IMO, I cant imagine Lottie trained in todays standards,,,, she wouldnt be able to have enough pups ,,,,,