Does anyone know what the 2022 forecast map looked like? Would be an interesting comparisonIt's always fun to see that map each year and what the prospects look like in each area of the state. Overall, considering the winter we had in a lot of parts of the state, this is really encouraging. Just shows what good nesting conditions will do for pheasants. Can't wait for the season!
Does anyone know what the 2022 forecast map looked like? Would be an interesting comparison
It's up 10% statewide but the core pheasant areas saw a 40-100% increaseUp 10% from last year? That's surprising given the winter and drought we've had.
That area in the north by Todd County is concerning. Massive drop there near Alexandria.
All it does is send everyone to the southwest corner of the state, like usual.It's up 10% statewide but the core pheasant areas saw a 40-100% increase
Hey, if you want to post waypoints of the area you hunt and pics from years past, I'm sure we could get a lot of people headed up that way.All it does is send everyone to the southwest corner of the state, like usual.
One would have to guess that every small town mayor is doing everything they can to get their town in those brown areas. Doing so would certainly boost the economics of your restaurants, hotels, bars and gas stations. Being successful means n doing that is a certain method for reelection. Now only if they knew who is doing the roadside counts in their area and if they could convince them to bump those numbers up a little……All it does is send everyone to the southwest corner of the state, like usual.
Not to my knowledge. The article may have just been saying what they believe to be the best counties or historically. I could probably guess 4 of their top 5 they listed without looking at any data.Does anyone know if the data can be accessed by county? It’s probably somewhere, I just may have missed it. The latest issue of Outdoor News lists a few of the top counties in their article, so I am wondering where they got that info.
I was wondering the same thing. They quoted specific numbers by county so I'd guess they have it. I searched the DNR site and didn't find it.Does anyone know if the data can be accessed by county? It’s probably somewhere, I just may have missed it. The latest issue of Outdoor News lists a few of the top counties in their article, so I am wondering where they got that info.
Those numbers must be extrapolated. They definitely didn't drive 100 miles in each county. So like Zeb said, it's an increase but I'm still taking the numbers with a grain of salt until I get my boots on the ground out there.I was wondering the same thing. They quoted specific numbers by county so I'd guess they have it. I searched the DNR site and didn't find it.
For reference, this is from the Outdoor News article...
Pheasants counted in Chippewa County totaled 184 per 100 miles (two routes). The 10-year average is 85 per 100 miles. But that count was trumped by two other counties: The Lyon County count was 214 per 100 miles, and the Lincoln County count was 190. Others topping 100 counted per 100 miles of survey routes included Murray County, at 183 per 100 miles; Yellow Medicine, at 171; Watonwan, at 167; Rock, at 162; Brown, at 149; Cottonwood, at 116; and Nobles, at 101.
Yes, that is what I was referring to - thanks for postingI was wondering the same thing. They quoted specific numbers by county so I'd guess they have it. I searched the DNR site and didn't find it.
For reference, this is from the Outdoor News article...
Pheasants counted in Chippewa County totaled 184 per 100 miles (two routes). The 10-year average is 85 per 100 miles. But that count was trumped by two other counties: The Lyon County count was 214 per 100 miles, and the Lincoln County count was 190. Others topping 100 counted per 100 miles of survey routes included Murray County, at 183 per 100 miles; Yellow Medicine, at 171; Watonwan, at 167; Rock, at 162; Brown, at 149; Cottonwood, at 116; and Nobles, at 101.
First-hand accounts from the field will tell the true story - excited to hear those stories and insights throughout the season. But the roadside counts in SW MN are encouraging and certainly a positive.Those numbers must be extrapolated. They definitely didn't drive 100 miles in each county. So like Zeb said, it's an increase but I'm still taking the numbers with a grain of salt until I get my boots on the ground out there.