As I tell both coaches and kids in sports, there's no reason for any of us to get in a butt biting contest with each other. We're on the same team and should be trying to bring each other up. We all have different perspectives and experience. So as to brome: brome is a sod-forming grass that has a lust for nitrogen and frequently becomes root bound and dies back withouit manipulation. From an agricultural standpoint, that is all part of doing business. From a gamebird standpoint, the sod-forming characteristic leads to significant brood loss and limited useability for gamebirds early in their life cycle and limited diversity always because the sod-forming characteristic chokes out forbs which limits the stand to just a cover niche. The cover is generally lost after the first significant frozen precipitation or even after heavy rainfall post-frost. The straw strength is significantly less than NWSG on an average stand. The need for frequent mechanical management and nitrogen inputs makes brome a financial burden when used for habitat. NWSG can be managed with fire or even cattle with positive financial returns without the inputs associated with brome. Yes, I have harvested a number of pheasants in brome fields, but that was all the cover that they had. I suspect that losses due to predation and environmental conditions are much higher in brome due to it losing much of it's cover value post snow/ice/rain. I have hunted after an ice storm to find many pheasants frozen to the ground in brome when in adjacent NWSG patches that was not found. Brome is cheaper to establish than NWSG, but the maintenance costs soon make NWSG the cheaper choice for the long run. In drier areas and areas that experience significant snow and ice, brome should not even be considered. If nesting and brood rearing are to be part of the desired function, brome scores way down the list too.