benelli-banger
Well-known member
OK, I don't do the NCAA brackets, I don't do fantasy sports stuff, etc...but now, I feel compelled to start something. Feel free to help, I know little about constructing polls, etc, on sights like this. But you will get the gist of what I am doing here. So, I am going to field a "team" of brood count survey locations...limited to 3, and I am going to pit them against another team of 3 locations that I am predicting victory over, based on % increase/decrease. So, my winning team is as follows: Chamberlain, Pierre, and Mobridge. My team I am playing against is as follows: Aberdeen, Brookings, Mitchell. Just going by % change from last year...averaging the 3.
Separately, I predict the overall change for 2016 will be greater than 25%...for the gamblers, is that called an "over/under"?
I am using scientific data in selecting my "teams". Please add to this any way you want!
I think my team will show an average increase of 40% or higher, and my opposing team will be up, but less than 25%. I bet one of my team locations will be up 60% or more! I bet one of my loser locations will be up by 15% or less. By the way, I don't hunt in any of these locations, though I do get closest to Mitchell...this has nothing to do with anything but being bored!
Separately, I predict the overall change for 2016 will be greater than 25%...for the gamblers, is that called an "over/under"?
I am using scientific data in selecting my "teams". Please add to this any way you want!
I think my team will show an average increase of 40% or higher, and my opposing team will be up, but less than 25%. I bet one of my team locations will be up 60% or more! I bet one of my loser locations will be up by 15% or less. By the way, I don't hunt in any of these locations, though I do get closest to Mitchell...this has nothing to do with anything but being bored!
