Thoughts on this past season

Troy,

I couldn't agree more. On the last Sunday of the season, while returning to the motel in an area not far from you, my buddy saw two roosters out feeding in some beans. The area across the road from the roosters (crp) used to be WHIA (now leased) and it was the only area for a couple of miles with decent habitat that wasn't WIHA.

As it was close to sunset, we decided to stop and take a couple of pictures since the colors were so vivid. When we got out of the truck the two roosters took off. When they took off, the crp behind us erupted. I've seen some large flushes over the years, but never ANYTHING like we saw that evening (in Kansas). I'm going to be very conservative and say that 300 birds got up and moved further into the field. Birds came up for what seemed to be quite some time.

Down the road a mile or so, we saw a group of 5 hunters that were quitting for the day. We stopped and asked them what they had seen that day. They stated that they'd been in the immediate area hunting/pounding WIHA's for two days and had seen roughly 30 birds and taken two with the only two shots presented.

I realize that all are welcomed to hunt here, but the pressure this year was absolutely insane.

You're quite correct, the birds certainly know where safety is.

Point!
 
As pointed out by others hunter numbers seemed to be way up this year. I know it has been discussed before but why does Kansas not have a walk in area stamp or something of the like? Seems like a $5 or $10 wiha stamp could provide more acres for wiha or to improve habitat on current areas that may not hold birds, thus spreading the pressure out a little more. I am not for pricing anybody out of hunting, but I do not think out of staters who are already dropping significant coin on the trip would be too put out by $10 to access wiha. Your thoughts...

BB
 
I think it is a good idea. The Kansas non resident hunting license is incredibly cheap compared to Idaho and surrounding states. A permit for $20 to hunt Walk In areas would be fair.
 
I believe it has something to do with "program income" which is part of the matrix by which the federal cost share is figured for the state. I'm guessing the adding the stamp would actually work against being able to draw down additional funds from the PR monies.
 
Back
Top