Sorghum Ethanol

Wirehairs

New member
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/epa-approve-grain-sorghum-cleaner-192504279.html


BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) -- The federal government is on the verge of approving a grain mainly used as livestock feed to make a cleaner version of ethanol, a decision officials say could give farmers a new moneymaking opportunity, boost the biofuels industry and help the environment.

A plant in western Kansas already is gearing up to take advantage, launching a multimillion-dollar renovation so it can be the first to turn sorghum — a plant similar in appearance to corn — into advanced ethanol. Advanced biofuels result in even less lifetime greenhouse gas production than conventional biofuels, measuring from the time a crop is planted to when the fuel is burned in a vehicle.

The only advanced biofuels in the United States now are sugar cane-based ethanol imported from Brazil and domestic biodiesel, a mixture of petroleum diesel and renewable sources such as soybean oil, said Matt Hartwig, spokesman for the Renewable Fuels Association. Advanced ethanol made from sorghum would give the nation another option as it aims to meet the federal goal of producing 36 billion gallons of renewable fuels per year by 2022.

"We need to continue to expand the base of feedstocks from which we produce biofuel," Hartwig said. "It's a good first step."

Almost all the ethanol produced in the U.S. now is conventional ethanol made from corn starch. Critics of the ethanol industry complain too much corn is going to energy production, resulting in higher food prices for consumers. Corn affects food prices in multiple ways because it's a widely used ingredient in food manufacturing and it's used to feed livestock.

More grain sorghum going to fuel production is unlikely to spark the same complaints, because it is not the main ingredient in a number of foods. While it can be used in human food, it's sold mainly to feed poultry, cattle and other livestock. Sweet sorghum produces edible syrup.

Sorghum also has environmental advantages. It is more tolerant of drought than other crops, including corn, and it produces about the same amount of ethanol per bushel as corn while requiring one-third less water.

It's less often used than corn in conventional ethanol because corn is much more plentiful, Hartwig said — U.S. corn acres this year outnumber sorghum acres about 16 to one. Also, most ethanol plants are in the Corn Belt focused around Iowa and Illinois, while sorghum is grown primarily in the central and southern Great Plains. Along with Kansas, the top producers are Colorado, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Texas.

The Environmental Protection Agency has concluded that ethanol made from grain sorghum can qualify as an advanced biofuel if it's made at plants with the proper green technology. The agency has taken public comments and will issue a final determination later. No time frame has been set.

Its approval would make sorghum-based ethanol more attractive because advanced ethanol commands a higher price than conventional, said Chris Cogburn, strategic business director for the National Sorghum Producers.

The question, Hartwig said, is whether ethanol producers are willing to install the equipment needed to produce advanced ethanol from sorghum.

"It has great potential for the future and (is) something the industry will be exploring, but we don't know about the impact here in the near future," he said.

Western Plains Energy LLC in Oakley, Kan., which makes conventional ethanol, aims to be the first to upgrade to that technology. The plant is installing equipment that will use methane gas from cattle manure rather than natural gas, cut down on water use and turn waste into a fertilizer. The transition will cost $30 million to $40 million and could be done by the end of the year or early next year.

"We're going to try to produce over 50 million gallons (of advanced ethanol) per year," said Curt Sheldon, the plant's chief accounting officer. "At today's prices, we could probably pay for the project in two to three years."

Western Plains plans to buy 17 ½ million bushels of grain sorghum a year from area farmers, and if more biofuel plants begin using sorghum, it has the potential to create a new and much bigger market for those growing the grain.

"Western Plains will be the first, but from our discussion with ethanol plants they won't be the last," said Cogburn, whose group helped push the EPA to recognize grain sorghum as a base for advanced biofuel. The effort also had support from the National Farmers Union.

No groups have stepped forward in opposition to approval.

Western Plains' switch to sorghum had to do with more than just economics, Sheldon said. Most of the company's managers and board members are farmers.

"And farmers are the ultimate environmentalists," he said. "They have to live on the land, work the land, raise their kids out there. We want to do our part."
 
How would this be renewable? There are water, fuel, fertilizer, pesticide, etc. inputs and it is doubtful there will be more energy gotten out of this than what went in.
 
i can't imagine, in reality, that this will be any better than corn, which envros now say is dirtier to produce than fossil fuels.....just saw and heard a documentary this week, stating such.....human and animal feed was never intended for a fuel source, unless you don't mind paying $10 for a pound of hamburger.
 
Grain Sorghum yields about 1/2 as much per acre as corn. So twice as many acres are needed to produce about the same ethanol.
Sorghum does better then corn in dry soil, so it can be planted in the dryer grasslands a good way to plow up more range land/wildlife habitat.
 
Grain Sorghum yields about 1/2 as much per acre as corn. So twice as many acres are needed to produce about the same ethanol.
Sorghum does better then corn in dry soil, so it can be planted in the dryer grasslands a good way to plow up more range land/wildlife habitat.

That's how I see too MNMT.:(

I suppose Sorghum will give better cover and easier access to the seed head for feeding later in the growing season vs. corn. But all and all I don't see this benefiting pheasants/wildlife much. I hope I'm wrong.

Wirehair, thank you for posting.
 
While this has nothing to do with the policy considerations behind ethanol and government support for it, I find that milo stalks offer the best pheasant hunting of all crop fields. It used to be wheat stubble but then came no till with all the herbicide and the wheat stubble is now weed free leaving it merely a feeding area for pheasants, not the all-in-one home it used to be.
 
Simple fact is milo is a better bird seed. It is bird seed.

A smart farmer still understands that in order to sustain his farm and maximize yields over the long haul he will have to rotate his crops in order to achieve this.

There will be short term thinkers in the mix but nature has designed her system and will always prevail.
 
This won't replace any of the corn ethanol production or replace any acres already being devoted to corn ethanol.

Any production of Sorghum based ethanol will simply be used to help offset the RFS requirement to produce 36 Billion gallons (from 15 Billion currently) of renewable fuel by 2022.

I agree with others. It will probably involve the accelerated conversion of dry lands currently not suited for corn production over to sorghum crop production. Because Pheasants seem to do well in areas transitioning from grasslands to crop production it is possible they may benefit to a degree but prairie grouse will likely suffer greatly.
 
EPA just announced today the approval of 15% ethanol mix in gas, up from 10%...not sure, but unless you have a flex fuel engine, you might sustain damage from burning this new mixture? of course the EPA couldn't care less.
 
All this is, is the Sorghum growers association it promoting their product, like everybody else and so be it.
Corn and sorghum uses the same fertilizer and adds the same organic matter in lesser amounts back to the soil as corn, so there is no since in rotating corn and Sorghum. Not like beans, grass or legumes, crops that are very good in a rotation.
Ethanol has ruined far more then enough wildlife habitat and caused way more then enough damage to the environment NO MORE!

We had a corn ethanol plant in NC MN just close down because of the high corn prices. :cheers:
 
Back
Top