There are quite a few Kansans who would agree! I'm happy to restrict non-residents from Missouri. We get a hole bunch of turkey and deer hunters, and every waterfowl show I see is filmed in Missouri. I believe that a lot of out of staters own duck clubs here, including quite a few in mine! By the way owning land and paying taxes will not assuredly get you a season long pass for waterfowl, or get you access to the "resident only", pheasant season. In North Dakota, owning a waterfowl area will not get you a season permit, you get a 7 day permit like any old, non-resident applicant. In North Dakota, you can hunt pheasants in the "resident only" season, on your own land. I asked both game departments, and I said no thanks! North Dakota had an amendment in the state house to allow season waterfowl permits to non residents, but it was defeated. In Iowa, I assume you know that on ground I own as a non-resident, I can hunt without a permit from the state, that is on only my own ground. I find that an equitable solution. Would for all the states. i have encouraged The Missouri department of conservation to spread out the deer and turkey season to allow for 2-5 day permits for residents from North or South Dakota, starting time 10-12 noon daily, after a 2 week resident only season, long enough to harvest the young or stupid and send the survivors off the reservation and back in the hills! For many years, by the way, I purchase a non-resident Iowa lisence anyway. I guess I feel that game laws provisions are to safeguard the game, not just select the bounty to a chosen few, I think I remember some idea of equality in our principles, not some George Orwell, 1984, " All animals equal, except pigs are more equal than the other animals"