So you're not technically hunting the tracks then. You're hunting the cover adjacent to it. Which is most likely private land.walking on tracks in pheasant country is downright lethal if a dog or two are in the cover below
You describe it being one way or another, I don’t think every hunter would only do it one way, or the other…I think I would be shifting back and forth between both sides of the tracks, checking things out…and walking the tracks, too…hard to know without being there! But I won’t be there, given what I’ve learned here…I can think of some spots I hunt that abut tracks…we get close, then turn around…can’t recall signage or notSo you're not technically hunting the tracks then. You're hunting the cover adjacent to it. Which is most likely private land.
Sounds like we need to call it what it is, "hunting the cover near railroad tracks," not actually hunting the railroad tracks.
That is what I was getting at. You are hunting the easement on either side of the tracks, not the actual tracks. Its like saying we're hunting a pond on the prairie whereas you're actually hunting the cover like cattails around the pond and not the actual pond. I may be taking things too literal here but people often refer to hunting rail road tracks when that is really not accurate because they are hunting the easement of the tracks.The easement is about 200 feet across ... to you have the rails, the ties and the rock in the elevated middle. The rail roads own the land in the ditches on both sides ... there is often good grassland, wood cover, willows, trees....