As an upland hunter you should'nt be worried about just your hunting spots. Should take pride in trying to help everywhere you can.
What the Hell are you talking about? Hunting spots? Taking Pride?
I've been upland birdhunting since '64' in many states and for many species. I've sat in meetings and at roundtable discussions, attended study presentations, kept abreast of issues across the US concerning upland birds especially, contributing where I could and commenting where I could not.
Before you make some stupid comment about what I should do, learn a bit.
You asked some questions. I, for one, answered with my opinion.
The fact that it was not what you wanted to hear is tough...the truth often is.
It's also a fact that effort would be best spent with a native specie of moderate present strength such as the woodcock in Louisiana rather than expending effort and energy, both being often in short supply, trying to institute your favorite bird.
It would hardly be wise to try for ruffed grouse populations in Kansas so....anyone with hog sense will move on to what has a spitting chance of working.
Pheasant do best in areas of wide spread non-fragmented cover, with food.
You think Louisiana can supply enough pheasant habitat, then I think you need to wipe the pheasant feathers from your eyes and look again.
No eff'in gamebird trumps another for me.....my personal choices relate to opportunity and personal tradition....nothing more.
I envy those who have sharptails out their back door or chukars up the hill or, as was mentioned, snipe in the wetlands.
You lad, should work toward something other than telling me what I should do as an upland hunter.
You truthfully sound like those annoying born-again folks who push their choice on others in the Kroger parking lot or the one-time drunks and smokers who NOW, have seen the light.
Spare me your upland pap.