King Corn Mowed Down 2 Million Acres of Grassland in 5 Years Flat

huntsem

Member
Goodbye Grasslands, Hello Corn

A new paper by South Dakota State University researchers published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science looked at recent land-use changes in what they call the "western corn belt"—North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, and Nebraska between 2006 and 2011. What they found was that grasslands in that region are being sacrificed to the plow at a clip "comparable to deforestation rates in Brazil, Malaysia, and Indonesia." According to the researchers, you have to go back to the 1920s and 1930s—the "era of rapid mechanization of US agriculture"—to find comparable rates of grassland loss in the region. All told, nearly two million acres of grassland—an area nearly the size of Rhode Island and Delaware combined—succumbed to the plow between 2006 and 2011, they found. Just 663,000 acres went from corn/soy to grassland during that period, meaning a net transfer of 1.3 million acres to the realm of King Corn.

http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2013/02/king-corn-gobbles-climate-stabilizing-grassland-midwest

From my own observations in N.E. Ohio I'd also add that more farms are harvesting the entire corn plant down to almost nothing. Combined with the increased use of weed killers this leaves mostly fields of mud wherever corn or soy is planted and I'm seeing more and more of that too. These practices have a large effect on a variety of wildlife which includes migrating waterfowl that used to feed in these fields. It seems that modern farming practices have turned to destroying more than giving and it wouldn't surprise me to see a return of "dust bowl" conditions in the midwest.

The native lands of upland birds did not depend on farming, those birds evolved and depend on grassland and shrubland habitats more than anything else.


*
 
farmers

don't ever believe the ol' saw of farmers and ranchers being the stewards of the land, in the west they have destroyed and raped more land and water than the oil and mining companies. also don't think for a minute that all this corn planted in large part for ethanol was a help to the environment either. storm coming in, bored!!

cheers
 
Note the study does not reference whether these grasslands are native or expiring CRP for example. Since they tout 663K acre went from crops to grass I suspect the acres are not just natives but also include CRP. While concerning not surprising as strong commodity prices would solidify the ends of 10 & 15 years contracts (which was the deal) and the returning of the soil banked ground back into production. That was always the plan.
 
did i see that one of those spending cuts by congress was elimination of farm subsidies?the government paid to keep that land in grass.
has alot of that gone away?asking the group
maybe we need an upland stamp,like a duck stamp
its gonna cost more than 25 bucks a year
what a $100?$200 a year?
the old days of hunting for free for many is probably over
some folks have access to family farms,bought a little land ,whatever
that's great
the more young people that take it up keeps it safe,political clout
times change ,the sport has to get out in front,fight back
 
Note the study does not reference whether these grasslands are native or expiring CRP for example. Since they tout 663K acre went from crops to grass I suspect the acres are not just natives but also include CRP. While concerning not surprising as strong commodity prices would solidify the ends of 10 & 15 years contracts (which was the deal) and the returning of the soil banked ground back into production. That was always the plan.

Yes this is SPOT ON.
I REALLY like the CRP grasslands, wish they were here forever.:)
If some one tells you these are native grasslands turning to corn, soy whatever.
Simple, Their wrong.
These are croplands set aside for when needed.
Needed now for corn ethanol. WELL:( it sucks for sure.
 
Note the study does not reference whether these grasslands are native or expiring CRP for example. Since they tout 663K acre went from crops to grass I suspect the acres are not just natives but also include CRP. While concerning not surprising as strong commodity prices would solidify the ends of 10 & 15 years contracts (which was the deal) and the returning of the soil banked ground back into production. That was always the plan.

Confirmed from onpoints other thread on this that these acres do include expiring CRP acres.
 
pheasant stamp

maybe. the problem with that is that most of our habit stamp money in colorado goes to or at least to is supporting wildlife areas for bird watching, nature trails and especially for elk management areas, to hell with the pheasants. the problem is how to control that extra money get used for its intended purpose and not some how get thrown into the general fund for the politicians

cheers
 
The report notes a significant conversion of marginal grass lands to corn production. These are grass lands previously used for grazing , marginal as crop lands as they are more prone to erosion and drought.



*
 
maybe. the problem with that is that most of our habit stamp money in colorado goes to or at least to is supporting wildlife areas for bird watching, nature trails and especially for elk management areas, to hell with the pheasants. the problem is how to control that extra money get used for its intended purpose and not some how get thrown into the general fund for the politicians

cheers

yes, we've heard these stories and i believe there probably true
im refering to the misuse of pittman roberts money ,tax on ammo and guns ,etc
i know it seems an impossible task ,but we're probably going to have to get involved somehow and watch what they do with our money
as we coloradans know vacationing hunters subsidize the income of many of our small town hotels,restaurants,and gas stations
like it or not this same principal works in Kansas,nebraska,and so.dakota to name a couple

point being, good hunting is an industry ,it has a cash flow.which means it has leverage.
it will evolve to something that we havent seen yet.should we try to guide it? :thumbsup:
 
Didn't mean to double on this subject. I didn't see this thread.

Onpoint
 
Pheasants are put on the back burner by state and Federal Natural resources.
Non native. Nowday's, there's a big push for the "native and natural"
There still is some "game management" by a couple Western States. As You all may have noticed? Game and Fish Departments are now "Wildlife" Parks, Natural Resources. That's were the $$$ go now, Non game species.
It amazes me how many people, even on UPH that defend native species like the Coyote. :)
No matter what we do we're not going to eliminate Mr Yote. We can control them so we can have some game to hunt though. The "healthy balance of predators" so popular with state and national Natural Resource Agencies certainly does not include hunters or hunting.

Couple examples. Western MT Elk and Deer hunting, once the best in the US.
Big game populations are now managed for the Canadian Grey Wolf. Hunters will get the leftovers. Hunter numbers and success has drop way off.

Northern MN has cancelled the Moose Season indefinitely. The deer permits are Antlers only. The wolf population has gone from 7-8 hundred to about 4,000 during the decline in Moose populations.
So why not keep the Wolves at 7-8 hundred, and have opportunities for hunters?
 
Back
Top