double trigger
Member
The property would be purchased with absolute deed restrictions that it NEVER be resold to ANYONE. Period.
The property would be purchased with restrictions that it be "managed" by the states or a contract with organizations like PF. But I truly question how much "management" this grass would need. The soil bank acreage was simply left fallow to the ravages of nature. Bird numbers EXPLODED. Oh, maybe some window dressing such as food plots and shelter belts could be added by state and PF type groups if so inclined and supported by sportsmen but simply having 60 million acres of fallow ground is 95%+ of the solution.
With 60 million acres of fallow ground in western pheasantland, motels in the rural pheasant belt of America would be full for the first 3 weeks of the season.
PHEASANTLAND defined:
Large parts of: MN, ND, MT, SD, IA, NE, KS. Perhaps some fringe areas of other states adjacent to these.
Forget the east. Write it off. It's not practical or worth the money to save pheasant hunting in these states. NO WAY-NO HOW. Concede them to the deer and turkey hunters.
I'm not trying to quibble about numbers and the more the better, but I would be happy to see at least 40 million acres of fallow grassland/habitat conserved. I think this was the cap during the height of the CRP and I'd like to see fallow land at least get back to that level again (and for good). Of course we might as well set the sights high at 60 mil to start with...:thumbsup: