515wingshooter
Active member
We get it. You like licking the bottom of a boot. Founders and Framers didn't even want a standing army let alone a "police force" with MRAPs. You can't have freedom and a large police force with great power. If you can't comprehend that, I can break it down further.What constitutional protection is the use of a game decoy infringing upon? Entrapment is a affirmative defense to criminal prosecution for a crime, and the courts have upheld that the use of game decoys to catch violators is a legitimate law enforcement method, not entrapment.
Militarize the police? As citizens we want to and can purchase any caliber high power rifle, magazines of high capacity, tannerite, thermal imaging optics, NVG optics and target illuminators,even ballistic protection, etc....but yet if law enforcement has this equipment to address the threats they face to perform their duties, it's "militarizing" them?
I don't want poachers or criminals. That being said, plenty of crime out there. They don't need to create a situation for a crime to take place. Today's law enforcement is like most of society....lazy.