CDOW and Co. State Parks to Merge

winchester21

New member
DOW AND PARKS TO COMBINE JULY 1

DENVER -- The Colorado Division of Wildlife and Colorado State Parks would merge into a new agency under one board and one administration on July 1 under legislation that will soon be submitted to the General Assembly, Gov. John Hickenlooper told a joint meeting of the Colorado Wildlife Commission and the State Parks Board today.

Addressing the joint meeting in the Hunter Education building on the Division of Wildlife campus, the Governor said the merger is part of his overall effort to make state government more effective and efficient. He recalled that in the 1960s and early 1970s, Colorado's state parks and wildlife programs were once managed by a single agency.

"This will be a challenge for all of us," Hickenlooper told the Commission and Board. "What will make this successful is peoples' willingness to work together as we strive for effectiveness and ways to be more efficient. We will need to find common paths, to bring questions and concerns to surface and to deal with them ways that provide assurances to employees while helping us avoid making cuts that would be very painful."

The Governor said he envisions a single agency that would support the gamut of wildlife and outdoor recreation opportunities while also managing a suite of properties that offer everything from active recreation near population centers to hunting and fishing in less-developed areas.

"Our parks system provides an entry-level opportunity for our citizens to experience the outdoors," Hickenlooper said. "If we don't have that, we're putting long-term support for wildlife at risk."

Department of Natural Resources Executive Director Mike King said the bill the administration will soon introduce would combine the Wildlife Commission and Parks Board and create the new agency by July 1. Sen. Gail Schwartz, D-Snowmass Village, Sen. Mary Hodge, D-Brighton, Rep. Jerry Sonnenberg, R-Sterling and Rep. Cheri Gerou, R-Evergreen will sponsor legislation to authorize the consolidation.

A second bill that would make the necessary modifications to state statutes is anticipated to be introduced in January 2012. Teams of employees from the two agencies would be asked to help develop the new organizational structure, he said.

"We've seen efforts before where outside consultants came in to tell us what the structure should look like," King said. "We've already got the talent we need to do this in these two agencies. They know what values need to be preserved. We're going to bring them together and ask them to chart the future."

Several other Western states operate combined parks and wildlife agencies, including Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Texas. Washington and Oregon are also currently in the process of combining their wildlife and parks programs. King said that 39 state parks offer fishing while 32 offer hunting opportunities and that wildlife revenues can be directed to parks for expenditures that primarily benefit wildlife habitat, wildlife viewing or other wildlife-related pursuits.

Both the Wildlife Commission and the Parks Board said they applauded the Governor's decision to address the situation facing State Parks and pledged to work to build the new agency.

"During the recovery of economy nationwide, no issue is more challenging than the problems facing state local government," said Parks Board member Bill Kane. "We stand ready and willing to do what can to make a successful endeavor."

Earlier in the meeting, Division of Wildlife Director Tom Remington briefed the Wildlife Commissioners on the 2010 harvest statistics. Hunters harvested a total of 48,018 elk, up slightly from 2009. Last year, cow elk represented 54 percent of the harvest. About half of the bulls harvested were taken by hunters who bought over-the-counter licenses, rather than applying through the limited license draw.

"We continue to harvest more elk in Colorado every year than most other states have," Remington said. In 2010, hunters harvested 12,301, topping the 12,000 mark for the first time. Remington said the harvest showed the Division's efforts to work with private landowners to increase hunting opportunity is paying off.

Deer harvest in 2010 was also up slightly. Hunters took a total of 34,768 deer in 2010. About half of the hunters during rifle seasons filled their tag, showing that Colorado continues to offer a tremendous opportunity for hunting quality mule deer, Remington said. He added that the deer population appears to be rebounding well from the harsh winter of 2007 and 2008.

In other action, Wildlife Commissioners reviewed draft language for a new regulation prohibiting the hunting, harassment or take of black bears in their dens and a regulation eliminating the $5 permit for hunting Greater Prairie chicken, though a small game license would still be required. Both regulations could be finalized at the May Commission meeting in Salida.

Commissioners also approved a surface use agreement for natural gas development at the James Mark Jones State Wildlife Area in South Park and denied a citizen rulemaking petition requesting that the Commission revise regulations pertaining to sponsorship requirements for wildlife rehabilitators.

During the afternoon session, Commissioners received a presentation on the hydrology of the Colorado River and the Wildlife Commission's role in reviewing water development plans proposed by Denver Water and the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District.

Wildlife Commissioners also unanimously reelected Chairman Tim Glenn, Vice Chairman Robert Streeter and Secretary Mark Smith to serve for the next year.

On Friday, the Wildlife Commission meets with the boards of the Colorado Cattlemen's Association and the Colorado Farm Bureau in the Bighorn Room at the Colorado Division of Wildlife's headquarters. The joint meeting, held annually, is scheduled to run from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

The Wildlife Commission meets monthly and travels to communities around the state to facilitate public participation in its processes. In 2011, the Commission will meet in Meeker, Salida, Grand Junction, Montrose, Alamosa, Steamboat Springs, Pueblo, Yuma, and Fort Collins. The first three meetings of 2011 have been held in Denver.

The Colorado Wildlife Commission is an 11-member board appointed by the governor. The Wildlife Commission sets Division of Wildlife regulations and policies for hunting, fishing, watchable wildlife, nongame, threatened and endangered species. The Commission also oversees Division of Wildlife land purchases and property regulations.

Information about the Wildlife Commission, including meeting agendas, can be found at http://wildlife.state.co.us/WildlifeCommission/ .

For more information about Division of Wildlife go to: http://wildlife.state.co.us.
 
Yep instead of less Government lets just lump them all together...
 
Hasn't worked out so bad for 'TX Parks & Wildlife' over the years (& one of the best outdoor-combo mags in the country too, w/articles on everything from hunting/fishing to birdwatching, reptiles, camping, spotlight on individual state parks, conservation, water rights, ect.) - actually, a pretty good thing for hunters/hunting in the public eye w/draw system mngmt hunts on almost all of the state parks in the system (which they temporarily shut down to the general public except for hunters during the hunt)! :thumbsup:

Probably more efficient, saving the state a few bucks too...When I lived in PA, never understood why the Game Commission & Fish Commission were two completely separate agencies (and whenever there was even the slightest hint of merging, oh buddy did the two agencies go to war to protect all those entrenched extra jobs at stake)...
 
Last edited:
Notice they didn't get any quotes from Todd Remington over this. He's probably mad as heck.

Anyway don't you guys on this forum get it? The state parks system can't manage their money. They get ATV registration money, Snowmobile registration money, and park fee money. And that isn't enough for them to run a whopping 42 parks. The DOW runs far far more and their money goes a lot further. So our smart new governor wants to combine the 2 so that the DOW can fund the state parks system until they both suck just so his friends won't complain about higher fees. Remember they raised the state park price $40 just 3 years ago and they still mismanage their money.

You better get out your wallet next year to hunt on the walk in areas and I'm sure they'll dream up a pheasant stamp, quail stamp, dove stamp, and whatever stamp they can just to fund the parks so they have new toilets, toilet paper, new trucks, etc.

So please write your legislators today Colorado residents and tell them to vote NO. The vote on this legislation will happen within the next 2 weeks most likely.
 
I think part of the problem with State Parks budget is the fact that our parks are being over built. In the past years many have added new facilities such as visitors centers, paved roads, electrical hookups, flush toilets, laundries and shower houses that require increased maintenance and staff to maintain.
Take a look at the visitor center at Steamboat Lake SP for example.....seems a bit opulent to me, and surely it costs additional monies that they don't seem to have for maintenance, utilities, staff, etc.
I realize that the staff needs a place for administrative duties and to interact with the public, but something a bit more modest seems more appropriate to me.
 
I think part of the problem with State Parks budget is the fact that our parks are being over built. In the past years many have added new facilities such as visitors centers, paved roads, electrical hookups, flush toilets, laundries and shower houses that require increased maintenance and staff to maintain.
Take a look at the visitor center at Steamboat Lake SP for example.....seems a bit opulent to me, and surely it costs additional monies that they don't seem to have for maintenance, utilities, staff, etc.
I realize that the staff needs a place for administrative duties and to interact with the public, but something a bit more modest seems more appropriate to me.

Yes but modest has nothing to do with spending this years money allowance...
If they dont spend it all they dont get the same or more next year, that is how the gov works, if they spend less they are not allowed that money next year,,,,,, so they go all out with all the crap they do so the money is spent.....

Dont you wish you could run your house the way the gov runs theres!!!:)
 
I wouldn't be comfortable spending more than I earn but it does not seem to bother the gov't. Perhaps it's because it is not their money.
A project like a visitor center center requires a lot of planning and must be designed and budgeted for. That's the time to get a handle on costs by designing a more modest facility and budgeting accordingly.
 
Back
Top