FWIW, may depend on your intended usage. I bought a very similar pair (TWO pairs - so a pair of pairs, I guess) from Beans some years back. Results were a poor fit - what I'd call the "mall fit" or "cowboy pants". Rode low and not enough leg room to swing a leg up over a barbed wire fence without hanging up on the important stuff, and no it wasn't a size or body shape issue. MUCH worse, the facings were cosmetic (see "mall attire"), not functional. First (and last, in these) time I went bird hunting my legs looked like hamburger when I got home, most uncomfortable. I didn't charge into a chainsaw (though it looked like I had) - just walked through some what I think they call multi-flora as I always had.
Also. My wife says I'm out of touch on today's prices. There is evidence to support this. But $119 for, basically, taupe colored jeans with some nylon facing? Sale or no sale, I'd personally put that money aside for my "next new shotgun" coffee can (can't trust them banks).
I have come to avoid Beans for the same reason I stopped buying Orvis - seems like their products became more fashion oriented than hard core functional - and their prices reflect it. Filson and Carhartt seem pricey (everything does to me these days) but seems like you do get the value you paid for.
Also. My wife says I'm out of touch on today's prices. There is evidence to support this. But $119 for, basically, taupe colored jeans with some nylon facing? Sale or no sale, I'd personally put that money aside for my "next new shotgun" coffee can (can't trust them banks).
I have come to avoid Beans for the same reason I stopped buying Orvis - seems like their products became more fashion oriented than hard core functional - and their prices reflect it. Filson and Carhartt seem pricey (everything does to me these days) but seems like you do get the value you paid for.
