Limitless
Well-known member
I've shot a fair number of roosters in The Mount Rushmore State, blissfully unaware of their questionable lineage. I thought the easier harvesting, versus Minnesota roosters, was simply a matter of the MN birds facing more pressure -- more hunters per bird. There was always a recognition that some small number of SD birds were the product of an unholy union between pure, wild birds, like those found in Minnesota, Iowa, and other states, and pen raised genetics. Now we find out that not only is that number probably much higher, but we have oodles of preserve coddled roosters crowding out the native birds, and getting in our bags, secretly posing as the real deal! Heck, that's not even counting the wild birds suffering from acquired EPS (Easy Pickin's Syndrome), where they become slow and lazy from hanging around the overwhelming numbers of tame roosters flooding the public and private lands each year. By the way, as an aside, I heard a rumor that pen raised birds favor the easy living life of South Dakota's elaborate ditch lands. It does make sense now why so many residents have an extra affinity to knocking down ditch chickens.Just because the nostrils don't show evidence of a blinder doesn't mean it's a wild bird. More and more commercial operations raise non blindered birds. Keeps the releases more discreet and helps keep the illusion of "100% wild birds." Remember, only licensed preserves have to mark their birds to identify released vs. wild for harvest reporting. Toe clips and cutting of a specific segment of wing feathers are two methods employed to mark non blindered release birds. It's this methodology and the lack of reporting requirements that make the annual GFP estimated pheasant harvest numbers laughable.
I feel dirty. Is there a soap of preference that South Dakota residents use, or do you just get used to it after a while?