Argus Leader article today

reddog

Well-known member
http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012311300012&nclick_check=1



Pollmann: Crisis looms in pheasant country

The loss of Conservation Reserve Program acres, native grassland and heavy wetland cover due to drainage (above) is putting a strain on South Dakota's pheasant habitat and the future of pheasant hunting. / John Pollmann / For the Argus Leader




Written by

John Pollmann

From a distance, the winding stretch of cattails didn’t look like much. Just another slough nestled between rolling hills of corn and soybeans.

But come the first flakes of snow and nights of single-digit cold, that oasis of thick cover was a lifesaver for the pheasants that roamed the countryside near my childhood home outside of Dell Rapids. And like any good pheasant hunter, where the birds went, I followed.

It was a long, chilly walk from the gravel road just to reach the waterway, and once I got there, the real work began. Clouds of frosty breath appeared with my every labored step as thick grass and cattails pulled at boots and calves.

With thighs and lungs burning, beads of sweat formed under my blaze orange hat despite the bitter cold. Any pheasant hunter who has done the same, however, knows that it was a labor of love.

Pheasants that had once been scattered across the section were now concentrated in these cattails, and I powered through the cover knowing that I was only a step or two away from watching another rooster thunder from the snow, cackling his disapproval over being ejected from the warmth below.

More roosters were missed than shot from the slough, but that winding length of snarly cover was a memory-maker for me. Taking a drive past it this fall, I was saddened to see, then, that the entire stretch of cattails and grass had been plowed under. Manicured banks of black dirt and a freshly trenched waterway remained in its stead.

If you’d take your own drive through countryside anywhere east of the Missouri River, you’d be hard-pressed to find a township that isn’t full of the same – acres of cattails and heavy grass (what game managers call thermal cover) or small tree claims and shelterbelts gone, likely forever.

These small chunks of habitat are all critical for maintaining a healthy pheasant population, but their demise isn’t receiving the publicity garnered by South Dakota’s declining enrollments in the Conservation Reserve Program (227,000 acres off the books in 2012 alone), not to mention the 2 million or so acres of native prairie that have gone green-side-down in the last two decades.








































Page




1
2
3

Next

John Pollmann is a freelance writer who reports on outdoor issues for the Argus Leader. Send feedback to argus-sports@argusleader.com
 
Writing is and has been on wall for several years. My kids will never expierence the quality of hunting or fishing as I have at least in South Dakota.
 
The problem isn't that the CRP program isn't paying for enough land, the problem is that our government skews the entire farming market to begin with.

40% of the corn grown goes to ethanol production. Crop prices are artificially inflated with price supports. Farmland reaches bubble prices and the government wants to try to entice farmers to set aside marginal ground with payments that are 1/3rd or 1/10th what they can earn by plowing and planting. Many have to plow it up to make their payments.

A wetland costs money to drain, tile and farm. But with soybeans at $12 bushel it might pay that farmer well to do so. At $6 beans if history is an indication, he wouldn't plow it up. In fact the proof is in the fact that the wetland is still there!

Our problem is that we accept Central Planning of our markets as a normal part of our way of life, yet I would bet anyone that if you ask 100 people if they want any part of their lives controlled by central planners in government you would get at least 90 people who say no and half those would say hell no!

History is full of failed central planning experiments. It doesn't work because the planners never have enough data and cannot handle the data they get. It is always much better to allow free market participants to decide what they wish to do in their own self interests. The cumulative experience and actions of millions of people will always drive better outcomes than 12 people in a backroom somewhere.

What we are witnessing in our farm markets today is the result of years of central planning gone bad. The farm/commodity market just hasn't imploded yet, but it will and in the process hunting will suffer, wildlife will suffer and eventually we will suffer.

That's what happens when artificially created bubbles collapse. Look at the housing bubble. It has screwed up our real estate markets for a decade now with no end in sight. There is no doubt we are in a farm land bubble now. It will do whaty all bubbles do.
 
Back
Top