Search results

But could you tell if the wheels were turning in her head? I hope this doesn't degrade to a tally and tabulation after every hunt of money ejected out the end of the gun. Might make a guy hesitate with each flush. :ROFLMAO:

I think the 45 year old would be at a disadvantage. Probably has a couple stiff joints.

A German wirehaired pointer or German shorthaired pointer might also stand a better chance of ground scenting, like the lab. It is funny though, because a friend of mine has a lab and she only air scents. So some of it probably comes down to their family tree and individual dogs, as well as...

Do you mean tracking before the flush or on a cripple, or both? Are his pointers English Pointers, or one of the German varieties?

Also easier to tell when the eaters are sick, if they stop eating.

In Minnesota, you should be fine if you are the owner of the property next to the one with the building. It is when you are not the owner, but have permission to hunt the owner's land, and the neighbor has a building with people or animals in it that is the problem. Then you need written...

One of my daughters lived in Minneapolis for a while. Lots of them right in busy areas:

Maybe it is just my Friday brain, but I'm not understanding what "no hunting from right of way signs" means. Did they put some special signs in the ditch and then this was a way to signify you can't shoot between the other signs? Nevermind. I think I figured it out. Should read: The DNR...

If it were me, I would push back on that. If the lasers are only shining on your property and not on the hunters or the ditch, that should be allowed. We are only talking about a 300 yard section along the ditch (I believe you said 300 yards would be good enough).

Good timing for this article that popped up for me just now: https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/minnesota/news/minnesota-farm-bird-flu-laser/ "Bird lasers embraced by Minnesota farmers to keep flocks healthy amid H5N1 outbreak" Talks about using them to keep ducks and geese away.

By "in", I meant in towards your property, not the ditch. That way they would have to cross the boundary/fence to mess with them.

Are you putting the signs right on the boundary of the ditch and your yard? Maybe putting them in a several feet would be better. It would be trespassing if they are going into your yard to mess with them. It would be frustrating to have signs disappear, but maybe some more durable ones would...

I am not suggesting the extra sign will be any good in court. It might dissuade some people from camping out in the ditch as close as they are to the cattle, which you stated are behind trees 60 feet from the road. Getting some people to move down is better than none.

A sign stating that there are livestock behind the trees that are 60 feet from the road, with a nicely worded plea to move down X number of feet might be a good compromise too.

I guess it depends on whether they are the same local geese each time or if they are just passing through. Reflective streamers might make them be more cautious too.

How about putting up blaze orange scarecrows or birds of prey on rotating posts if you don't want waterfowl flying over your property?

Put 'em in the bag to keep them dry and warm. ;)

Here is the video of the Senate hearing: Pertinent part starts at 32:41 into the video.