I cited my data source. What is yours, and what year(s) are you looking at? Even more importantly - where does the trend line tell you that number is headed over the coming years? I don't think you are going to much like where it winds up if nothing changes, or nothing is done to change it.
But lets say the US Fish and Wildlife Service is incorrect, and your number is spot on for some reason. For the sake of discussion - what is the difference in the validity of the conclusions drawn, if the correct number IS over 50% vice under 70%? Not much of a gap to begin with, and either way - just way out of balance, unless you happen to be an out of state outfitter, or direct beneficiary thereof.
Just curious. To what do you attribute the stunningly low percentage of Kansans taking advantage of the incredible hunting your state has to offer,
if not diminished access?
A top to bottom review of KDWPT policies regarding the promotion and sales of non-resident sales is much needed. I'm sure you will disagree - but why?