Well, as usual the 1st week of Nov. was reserved for my annual 1st trip to South Dakota. I was so pumped to hear the reports of higher numbers and couldn't wait to get out and see the big numbers.
Now the reality, it was the worst I have seen it. I hunted areas that I had great success last year as well as areas that I had great success in the past. ALL of which were poor for numbers. I'm so disappointed that I'm thinking of not going back for the 3 more trips I was thinking of taking. I was pumped for this years hunts and now I'm thing of hitting Iowa and Kansas late season.
The good: I took my good lab and my new pup, was impressed with the pup and what she might be capable of. I was hoping she would have more chances to get her nose on birds but she seemed more than interested in just working to find any sort of scent. She had some great turns on birds, so I was happy to see that.
The bad: seems like the reported numbers have the hunter numbers up as well, I saw more hunters in the areas that I hunt than I have since 2012. More boots on the ground and less birds isn't a good combo.
I understand that's why they call this hunting but I'm disappointed and feel their number counts were more about drawing hunters and dollars after a few poor years.
Not sure I'm going back, unless I can find an area with some better numbers. I'm not interested in paying to play.... I put a bunch of money at a game farm and keep my girls on birds all season anyways. Research will help me figure out if I'm going back or not. I'm gonna put the call out to some of the guys from on here and see what they know and have heard, hope to hear something better than what I saw this last week!
Avg. was one bird per man a day, that's is as poor as it gets for 2 guys and 3 dogs on the ground, I can get those numbers closer to home and don't need to put 1000 miles on to do that.
I hunted ALL public as usual and feel the cover was fine, the available water was fine, the only thing missing was the bird number they said they had.
I hope guys had better hunts than mine!
Now the reality, it was the worst I have seen it. I hunted areas that I had great success last year as well as areas that I had great success in the past. ALL of which were poor for numbers. I'm so disappointed that I'm thinking of not going back for the 3 more trips I was thinking of taking. I was pumped for this years hunts and now I'm thing of hitting Iowa and Kansas late season.
The good: I took my good lab and my new pup, was impressed with the pup and what she might be capable of. I was hoping she would have more chances to get her nose on birds but she seemed more than interested in just working to find any sort of scent. She had some great turns on birds, so I was happy to see that.
The bad: seems like the reported numbers have the hunter numbers up as well, I saw more hunters in the areas that I hunt than I have since 2012. More boots on the ground and less birds isn't a good combo.
I understand that's why they call this hunting but I'm disappointed and feel their number counts were more about drawing hunters and dollars after a few poor years.
Not sure I'm going back, unless I can find an area with some better numbers. I'm not interested in paying to play.... I put a bunch of money at a game farm and keep my girls on birds all season anyways. Research will help me figure out if I'm going back or not. I'm gonna put the call out to some of the guys from on here and see what they know and have heard, hope to hear something better than what I saw this last week!
Avg. was one bird per man a day, that's is as poor as it gets for 2 guys and 3 dogs on the ground, I can get those numbers closer to home and don't need to put 1000 miles on to do that.
I hunted ALL public as usual and feel the cover was fine, the available water was fine, the only thing missing was the bird number they said they had.
I hope guys had better hunts than mine!
Last edited: